在我的电脑上,秒表返回的值太低了。例如,当我指定 Thread.Sleep(1000)
时为 200 毫秒。该程序应该等待 1 秒。我还使用 ManualResetEvent.WaitOne(1000)
进行了测试,得到了相同的结果。框架 2.0 和 3.0 都给出了这种奇怪的行为。我正在运行带有 .NET Framework 3.5 SP1 的 Windows XP SP3。
这是我的测试结果(下面的代码):
1000 ms for DateTime.Now.Ticks
0201 ms for Stopwatch.ElapsedTicks
0142 ms for Stopwatch.ElapsedMilliseconds
0139 ms for Stopwatch.ElapsedTicks after Reset
0264 ms for Stopwatch.ElapsedTicks setting ThreadAffinity
0151 ms for Stopwatch.ElapsedTicks setting ProcessorAffinity (and more)
0371 ms for Stopwatch.ElapsedTicks with Syncronized object
Done!
//Program.cs文件
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
StopWatchTest.Go();
Console.WriteLine("Done!");
Console.ReadLine();
}
}
//StopWatchTest.cs 类
internal static class StopWatchTest
{
public const int SleepTime = 1000;
public static void Go()
{
#region Test #0 with DateTime.Now.Ticks
long startTick = DateTime.Now.Ticks;
Thread.Sleep(SleepTime);
long stopTick = DateTime.Now.Ticks;
long elapsedDt = (stopTick - startTick) * 100;
Display((int)(elapsedDt / 1000 / 1000), "DateTime.Now.Ticks");
#endregion Test #0 with DateTime.Now.Ticks
Stopwatch watch = Stopwatch.StartNew();
long frequency = Stopwatch.Frequency;
double nanosecPerTick = (1000.0 * 1000.0 * 1000.0) / frequency;
#region Test #1 with Stopwatch.ElapsedTicks
startTick = watch.ElapsedTicks;
Thread.Sleep(SleepTime);
stopTick = watch.ElapsedTicks;
double elapsedSw = (stopTick - startTick) * nanosecPerTick;
Display((int)(elapsedSw / 1000 / 1000), "Stopwatch.ElapsedTicks");
#endregion Test #1 with Stopwatch.ElapsedTicks
#region Test #2 with Stopwatch.ElapsedMilliseconds
startTick = watch.ElapsedMilliseconds;
Thread.Sleep(SleepTime);
stopTick = watch.ElapsedMilliseconds;
Display((int)(stopTick - startTick), "Stopwatch.ElapsedMilliseconds");
#endregion Test #2 with Stopwatch.ElapsedMilliseconds
#region Test #3 with Stopwatch.ElapsedTicks after Reset
watch.Stop();
watch.Reset();
watch.Start();
startTick = watch.ElapsedTicks;
Thread.Sleep(SleepTime);
stopTick = watch.ElapsedTicks;
elapsedSw = (stopTick - startTick) * nanosecPerTick;
Display((int)(elapsedSw / 1000 / 1000), "Stopwatch.ElapsedTicks after Reset");
#endregion Test #3 with Stopwatch.ElapsedTicks after Reset
#region Test #4 with Stopwatch.ElapsedTicks and ThreadAffinity
Thread.BeginThreadAffinity();
startTick = watch.ElapsedTicks;
Thread.Sleep(SleepTime);
stopTick = watch.ElapsedTicks;
elapsedSw = (stopTick - startTick) * nanosecPerTick;
Display((int)(elapsedSw / 1000 / 1000), "Stopwatch.ElapsedTicks setting ThreadAffinity");
Thread.EndThreadAffinity();
#endregion Test #4 with Stopwatch.ElapsedTicks and ThreadAffinity
#region Test #5 with Stopwatch.ElapsedTicks and ProcessorAffinity (and more)
const int affinity = 0x0001;
Process proc = Process.GetCurrentProcess();
proc.ProcessorAffinity = new IntPtr(affinity);
proc.PriorityClass = ProcessPriorityClass.High;
ProcessThreadCollection ptc = proc.Threads;
foreach (ProcessThread pt in ptc)
{
pt.IdealProcessor = 0;
pt.ProcessorAffinity = new IntPtr(affinity);
}
Thread.CurrentThread.Priority = ThreadPriority.Highest;
startTick = watch.ElapsedTicks;
Thread.Sleep(SleepTime);
stopTick = watch.ElapsedTicks;
elapsedSw = (stopTick - startTick) * nanosecPerTick;
Display((int)(elapsedSw / 1000 / 1000), "Stopwatch.ElapsedTicks setting ProcessorAffinity (and more)");
#endregion Test #5 with ProcessorAffinity and more
#region Test #6 with Syncronized object
elapsedSw = new SyncTimer().Go();
Display((int)(elapsedSw / 1000 / 1000), "Stopwatch.ElapsedTicks with Syncronized object");
#endregion Test #6 with Syncronized object
}
private static void Display(int milliseconds, string testName)
{
Console.WriteLine("{0:0000} ms for {1}", milliseconds, testName);
}
}
[Synchronization]
internal class SyncTimer : ContextBoundObject
{
[MethodImpl(MethodImplOptions.Synchronized)]
public double Go()
{
Stopwatch.StartNew();
long frequency = Stopwatch.Frequency;
double nanosecPerTick = (1000.0 * 1000.0 * 1000.0) / frequency;
long startTick = Stopwatch.GetTimestamp();
Thread.Sleep(StopWatchTest.SleepTime);
long stopTick = Stopwatch.GetTimestamp();
return (stopTick - startTick) * nanosecPerTick;
}
}
最佳答案
查看以下链接:
System.Diagnostics.Stopwatch returns negative numbers in Elapsed... properties
秒表的准确性似乎存在问题,这可能导致它返回负的耗时,而且时间变化很大。如果您查看 Connect 问题,那里的大多数人都在谈论在虚拟机上看到该问题,这就是我们看到负 Elapsed 值问题的地方。
查看 QueryPerformanceCounter doc ,这似乎暗示这个问题可能由于 BIOS 或硬件抽象层错误而发生在多处理器系统上,但没有提供更多信息,也不是特定于虚拟机。
至于这个问题的解决方法……我google了很多都没有找到。您可以忽略小于零的值,这并不理想,但在某些情况下可行。但这并不能解决您的问题 - 您如何知道哪些值无效?
希望这能有所帮助。
关于c# - .NET System.Diagnostics.Stopwatch 问题(返回值太低),我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5113750/