我得到了这个简短的 C 代码。
#include <stdint.h>
uint64_t multiply(uint32_t x, uint32_t y) {
uint64_t res;
res = x*y;
return res;
}
int main() {
uint32_t a = 3, b = 5, z;
z = multiply(a,b);
return 0;
}
上面给定的 C 代码还有一个汇编代码。 我不明白该汇编代码的全部内容。我对每一行都进行了评论,您可以在每一行的评论中找到我的问题。
汇编代码是:
.text
multiply:
pushl %ebp // stores the stack frame of the calling function on the stack
movl %esp, %ebp // takes the current stack pointer and uses it as the frame for the called function
subl $16, %esp // it leaves room on the stack, but why 16Bytes. sizeof(res) = 8Bytes
movl 8(%ebp), %eax // I don't know quite what "8(%ebp) mean? It has to do something with res, because
imull 12(%ebp), %eax // here is the multiplication done. And again "12(%ebp).
movl %eax, -8(%ebp) // Now, we got a negative number in front of. How to interpret this?
movl $0, -4(%ebp) // here as well
movl -8(%ebp), %eax // and here again.
movl -4(%ebp), %edx // also here
leave
ret
main:
pushl %ebp // stores the stack frame of the calling function on the stack
movl %esp, %ebp // // takes the current stack pointer and uses it as the frame for the called function
andl $-8, %esp // what happens here and why?
subl $24, %esp // here, it leaves room for local variables, but why 24 bytes? a, b, c: the size of each of them is 4 Bytes. So 3*4 = 12
movl $3, 20(%esp) // 3 gets pushed on the stack
movl $5, 16(%esp) // 5 also get pushed on the stack
movl 16(%esp), %eax // what does 16(%esp) mean and what happened with z?
movl %eax, 4(%esp) // we got the here as well
movl 20(%esp), %eax // and also here
movl %eax, (%esp) // what does happen in this line?
call multiply // thats clear, the function multiply gets called
movl %eax, 12(%esp) // it looks like the same as two lines before, except it contains the number 12
movl $0, %eax // I suppose, this line is because of "return 0;"
leave
ret
最佳答案
相对于 %ebp 的负引用适用于堆栈上的局部变量。
movl 8(%ebp), %eax // I don't know quite what "8(%ebp) mean? It has to do something with res, because`
%eax = x
imull 12(%ebp), %eax // here is the multiplication done. And again "12(%ebp).
%eax = %eax * y
movl %eax, -8(%ebp) // Now, we got a negative number in front of. How to interpret this?
(u_int32_t)res = %eax//设置 res 的低 32 位
movl $0, -4(%ebp) // here as well
清除res的高32位以将32位乘法结果扩展为uint64_t
movl -8(%ebp), %eax // and here again.
movl -4(%ebp), %edx // also here
返回ret;//64 位结果作为一对 32 位寄存器返回 %edx:%eax
主要参见x86 calling convention这可能有助于理解发生的事情。
andl $-8, %esp // what happens here and why?
堆栈边界按 8 对齐。我相信这是 ABI 要求
subl $24, %esp // here, it leaves room for local variables, but why 24 bytes? a, b, c: the size of each of them is 4 Bytes. So 3*4 = 12
8 的倍数(可能是由于对齐要求)
movl $3, 20(%esp) // 3 gets pushed on the stack
a = 3
movl $5, 16(%esp) // 5 also get pushed on the stack
b = 5
movl 16(%esp), %eax // what does 16(%esp) mean and what happened with z?
%eax = b
z 位于 12(%esp),尚未使用。
movl %eax, 4(%esp) // we got the here as well
将 b 放入堆栈(multiply() 的第二个参数)
movl 20(%esp), %eax // and also here
%eax=a
movl %eax, (%esp) // what does happen in this line?
将 a 放入堆栈(multiply() 的第一个参数)
call multiply // thats clear, the function multiply gets called
乘以 %edx:%eax 形式返回 64 位结果
movl %eax, 12(%esp) // it looks like the same as two lines before, except it contains the number 12
z = (uint32_t) 乘法()
movl $0, %eax // I suppose, this line is because of "return 0;"
是的。返回0;
关于C 代码表示为汇编代码 - 如何解释?,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/19984869/