For every
std::atomic<X>
(whether or not specialized),std::atomic<X>::value_type
is X.
但是如果我尝试使用这种类型,我会得到一个编译错误。
我用 g++ 8.2.1
试过了:
$ g++ -std=c++11 test.cc
test.cc: In function ‘int main()’:
test.cc:6:23: error: ‘value_type’ is not a member of ‘std::atomic<int>’
std::atomic<int>::value_type x = 0;
还有 clang 6.0.1
$ clang -std=c++11 test.cc
test.cc:6:23: error: no type named 'value_type' in 'std::atomic<int>'
std::atomic<int>::value_type x = 0;
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
前面提到的引用手册还明确指出...
specification was substantially rewritten to resolve numerous issues in particular, member typedefs value_type and difference_type are added
P0558R1然而,规范似乎并不禁止 value_type
的存在。 .
知道发生了什么吗?
编辑
我的一位同事让我意识到 P0558R1 只是一个提案。
最佳答案
您正在明确使用 C++11。如果我们查看 last draft 的第 1119 页在 C++11 标准中,没有提及 std::atomic
的 value_type
:
template <class T> struct atomic {
bool is_lock_free() const volatile;
bool is_lock_free() const;
void store(T, memory_order = memory_order_seq_cst) volatile;
void store(T, memory_order = memory_order_seq_cst);
T load(memory_order = memory_order_seq_cst) const volatile;
T load(memory_order = memory_order_seq_cst) const;
operator T() const volatile;
operator T() const;
T exchange(T, memory_order = memory_order_seq_cst) volatile;
T exchange(T, memory_order = memory_order_seq_cst);
bool compare_exchange_weak(T&, T, memory_order, memory_order) volatile;
bool compare_exchange_weak(T&, T, memory_order, memory_order);
bool compare_exchange_strong(T&, T, memory_order, memory_order) volatile;
bool compare_exchange_strong(T&, T, memory_order, memory_order);
bool compare_exchange_weak(T&, T, memory_order = memory_order_seq_cst) volatile;
bool compare_exchange_weak(T&, T, memory_order = memory_order_seq_cst);
bool compare_exchange_strong(T&, T, memory_order = memory_order_seq_cst) volatile;
bool compare_exchange_strong(T&, T, memory_order = memory_order_seq_cst);
atomic() = default;
constexpr atomic(T);
atomic(const atomic&) = delete;
atomic& operator=(const atomic&) = delete;
atomic& operator=(const atomic&) volatile = delete;
T operator=(T) volatile;
T operator=(T);
};
它在 C++14 草案中同样不存在。
cppreference 未能为 value_type
提及“自 C++17 起”。
编辑:有人指出,value_type
的添加是以缺陷报告的形式出现的,应该追溯应用于 C++11 的实现。因此,cppreference 实际上并没有错,DR 只是尚未在给定的编译器版本中实现。
关于c++ - std::atomic<X>::value_type 发生了什么?,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/53648614/