通过谷歌测试,让我们假设以下代码
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
using MyFunc = void (*)(void);
void foo_robust(MyFunc f) { if(f != nullptr) (*f)(); }
void foo_not_robust(MyFunc f) { (*f)(); }
void print(void) { cout << "hello world" << endl; }
int main()
{
foo(&print); //works
foo(nullptr); //runtime error ?
return 0;
}
使用google测试时,
我能做到:
TEST(TestAssertDeath, Death)
{
EXPECT_DEATH(foo(&print)); //will return FAILED, because does not die.
EXPECT_DEATH(foo(nullptr)); //will return FAILED if foo robust, OK otherwise (UB: it might even return FAILED)
}
我想做的事:
TEST(TestAssertDeath, No_Death)
{
EXPECT_NO_DEATH(foo(&print)); //will return OK, because does not die.
EXPECT_NO_DEATH(foo(nullptr)); // will return OK, if foo is robust, FAILED or DEATH otherwise (UB: it might even return OK)
}
是否有任何谷歌宏可以完成“EXPECT_NO_DEATH”的工作? 我试过 EXPECT_NO_FATAL_FAILURE 但它崩溃了,就好像我什么也没放一样。 我想做的:
TEST(TestAssertDeath, No_Death)
{
EXPECT_NO_FATAL_FAILURE(foo(&print)); //will return OK, because does not die.
EXPECT_NO_FATAL_FAILURE(foo(nullptr)); // will crash (UB: might even return OK)
}
但我不希望测试事件停止。
Google 测试目前给我以下错误。
[ RUN ] MyClass.MyUnitTestA
[ OK ]
[ RUN ] MyClass.MyUnitTestB
[ OK ]
[ RUN ] MyClass.MyUnitTestC
mingw32-make[3]: *** [CMakeFiles/myproject-coverage] Error -1073741819
mingw32-make[2]: *** [CMakeFiles/myproject-coverage.dir/all] Error 2
mingw32-make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/myproject-coverage.dir/rule] Error 2
mingw32-make: *** [myproject-coverage] Error 2
因为这会阻止其他测试运行,所以如果代码不健壮,我想要如下内容
[ RUN ] MyClass.MyUnitTestA
[ OK ]
[ RUN ] MyClass.MyUnitTestB
[ OK ]
[ RUN ] MyClass.MyUnitTestC
[ DEATH ] or [ FAILED ]
[ RUN ] MyClass.MyUnitTestD
[ OK ]
如果代码是健壮的:
[ RUN ] MyClass.MyUnitTestA
[ OK ]
[ RUN ] MyClass.MyUnitTestB
[ OK ]
[ RUN ] MyClass.MyUnitTestC
[ OK ]
[ RUN ] MyClass.MyUnitTestD
[ OK ]
重要说明:我知道 foo_not_robust(nullptr) 行是 UB,不会自动崩溃,但如果发生崩溃,我希望跳过此行并将其标记为失败.
最佳答案
为了使单元测试对崩溃具有鲁棒性,您可以尝试在子进程中运行每个测试,父进程监控子进程的成功、失败或崩溃。
但是有一个简单的方法,实际上你可以做一些EXPECT_NO_DEATH
来自谷歌测试文档:
TEST(MyDeathTest, NormalExit) { EXPECT_EXIT(NormalExit(), ::testing::ExitedWithCode(0), "Success"); }
您可以通过使用两个语句 (statement1,statement2)
和 statement1 = statement
和 statement2 = exit(0)
来破解它。
它给出了以下两个自定义宏:
# define EXPECT_CRASH(statement) \
EXPECT_EXIT((statement,exit(0)),::testing::KilledBySignal(SIGSEGV),".*")
# define EXPECT_NO_CRASH(statement) \
EXPECT_EXIT((statement,exit(0)),::testing::ExitedWithCode(0),".*")
EXPECT_CRASH()
等同于 EXPECT_DEATH()
EXPECT_NO_CRASH()
等同于请求的 EXPECT_NO_DEATH()
请注意 ::testing::KilledBySignal(signal_number)
在 Windows 上不可用。
作为 Windows 的解决方法,您可以做的只是定义:
# define EXPECT_CRASH(statement) \
EXPECT_DEATH(statement,".*")
给出以下信息:
[ RUN ] MyClass.MyUnitTestA
[ OK ]
[ RUN ] MyClass.MyUnitTestB
[ OK ]
[ RUN ] MyClass.MyUnitTestC
Death test: (foo(),exit(0))
Result: died but not with expected exit code:
Exited with exit status -1073741819
Actual msg:
[ DEATH ]
[ RUN ] MyClass.MyUnitTestD
[ OK ]
关于c++ - EXPECT_DEATH 的倒数是什么?,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/57312559/