c# - .NET 引用源代码中的四个破折号组是什么？

Question

我正在浏览 PluralizationService 的源代码当我注意到一些奇怪的事情时。类里面有几本私有(private)词典，反射(reflect)了不同的多元化规则。例如:

    private string[] _uninflectiveWordList =
        new string[] { 
            "bison", "flounder", "pliers", "bream", "gallows", "proceedings", 
            "breeches", "graffiti", "rabies", "britches", "headquarters", "salmon", 
            "carp", "----", "scissors", "ch----is", "high-jinks", "sea-bass", 
            "clippers", "homework", "series", "cod", "innings", "shears", "contretemps", 
            "jackanapes", "species", "corps", "mackerel", "swine", "debris", "measles", 
            "trout", "diabetes", "mews", "tuna", "djinn", "mumps", "whiting", "eland", 
            "news", "wildebeest", "elk", "pincers", "police", "hair", "ice", "chaos",
            "milk", "cotton", "pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis",
            "information", "aircraft", "scabies", "traffic", "corn", "millet", "rice", 
            "hay", "----", "tobacco", "cabbage", "okra", "broccoli", "asparagus", 
            "lettuce", "beef", "pork", "venison", "mutton",  "cattle", "offspring", 
            "molasses", "shambles", "shingles"};

字符串中的四个破折号是几组？我没有看到它们在代码中得到处理，所以它们不是某种模板。我唯一能想到的是，那些是经过审查的咒骂('ch----is' 将是 'chassis')，在这种情况下，这实际上损害了可读性。还有其他人遇到过这个吗？如果我对实际的完整列表感兴趣，我将如何查看它？

Answer 1

来自使用Reflector查看反编译后的代码，我可以验证编译后的版本中没有“----”，它确实看起来确实是某种审查制度。反编译代码在构造函数中有这个:

this._uninflectiveWordList = new string[] { 
    "bison", "flounder", "pliers", "bream", "gallows", "proceedings", "breeches", "graffiti", "rabies", "britches", "headquarters", "salmon", "carp", "herpes", "scissors", "chassis", 
    "high-jinks", "sea-bass", "clippers", "homework", "series", "cod", "innings", "shears", "contretemps", "jackanapes", "species", "corps", "mackerel", "swine", "debris", "measles", 
    "trout", "diabetes", "mews", "tuna", "djinn", "mumps", "whiting", "eland", "news", "wildebeest", "elk", "pincers", "police", "hair", "ice", "chaos", 
    "milk", "cotton", "pneumonoultramicroscopicsilicovolcanoconiosis", "information", "aircraft", "scabies", "traffic", "corn", "millet", "rice", "hay", "hemp", "tobacco", "cabbage", "okra", "broccoli", 
    "asparagus", "lettuce", "beef", "pork", "venison", "mutton", "cattle", "offspring", "molasses", "shambles", "shingles"
 };

如您所见，被删减的词是“herpes”、“chassis”和“hemp”(如果我没听错的话)。我个人认为这些都不需要审查，这表明它是某种自动化系统在做这件事。我会假设原始源包含它们，而不是将它们添加到某种预编译合并中(如果没有别的，因为“----”真的不足以说明应该用什么代替)。我想出于某种原因，引用网站会对其进行审查。

Hans Passant 也在评论中链接到一个非常相似的问题的答案:What does ----s mean in the context of StringBuilder.ToString()? .这解释了“已发布引用源的源代码通过过滤器推送，该过滤器从源中删除了令人反感的内容”。