python - 计算k-means的方差百分比？

标签 python numpy statistics cluster-analysis k-means

在 Wikipedia page ，描述了一种肘部方法，用于确定 k-means 中的聚类数。 The built-in method of scipy提供了一个实现，但我不确定我是否理解他们所说的失真是如何计算的。

More precisely, if you graph the percentage of variance explained by the clusters against the number of clusters, the first clusters will add much information (explain a lot of variance), but at some point the marginal gain will drop, giving an angle in the graph.

假设我有以下点及其相关的质心，计算此度量的好方法是什么？

points = numpy.array([[ 0,  0],
       [ 0,  1],
       [ 0, -1],
       [ 1,  0],
       [-1,  0],
       [ 9,  9],
       [ 9, 10],
       [ 9,  8],
       [10,  9],
       [10,  8]])

kmeans(pp,2)
(array([[9, 8],
   [0, 0]]), 0.9414213562373096)

我正在专门研究计算 0.94.. 仅给出点和质心的度量。我不确定是否可以使用任何 scipy 的内置方法，或者我必须自己编写。关于如何有效地为大量点执行此操作的任何建议？

简而言之，我的问题(所有相关的)如下:

  • 给定一个距离矩阵和哪个点属于哪个点的映射 集群，什么是计算可以使用的度量的好方法 绘制肘部图？
  • 如果使用不同的距离函数(例如余弦相似度)，该方法将如何变化？

编辑 2:失真

from scipy.spatial.distance import cdist
D = cdist(points, centroids, 'euclidean')
sum(numpy.min(D, axis=1))

第一组点的输出是准确的。但是，当我尝试不同的设置时:

>>> pp = numpy.array([[1,2], [2,1], [2,2], [1,3], [6,7], [6,5], [7,8], [8,8]])
>>> kmeans(pp, 2)
(array([[6, 7],
       [1, 2]]), 1.1330618877807475)
>>> centroids = numpy.array([[6,7], [1,2]])
>>> D = cdist(points, centroids, 'euclidean')
>>> sum(numpy.min(D, axis=1))
9.0644951022459797

我猜最后一个值不匹配，因为 kmeans 似乎将该值除以数据集中的点总数。

编辑 1:百分比方差

到目前为止我的代码(应该添加到 Denis 的 K-means 实现中):

centres, xtoc, dist = kmeanssample( points, 2, nsample=2,
        delta=kmdelta, maxiter=kmiter, metric=metric, verbose=0 )

print "Unique clusters: ", set(xtoc)
print ""
cluster_vars = []
for cluster in set(xtoc):
    print "Cluster: ", cluster

    truthcondition = ([x == cluster for x in xtoc])
    distances_inside_cluster = (truthcondition * dist)

    indices = [i for i,x in enumerate(truthcondition) if x == True]
    final_distances = [distances_inside_cluster[k] for k in indices]

    print final_distances
    print np.array(final_distances).var()
    cluster_vars.append(np.array(final_distances).var())
    print ""

print "Sum of variances: ", sum(cluster_vars)
print "Total Variance: ", points.var()
print "Percent: ", (100 * sum(cluster_vars) / points.var())

以下是 k=2 的输出:

Unique clusters:  set([0, 1])

Cluster:  0
[1.0, 2.0, 0.0, 1.4142135623730951, 1.0]
0.427451660041

Cluster:  1
[0.0, 1.0, 1.0, 1.0, 1.0]
0.16

Sum of variances:  0.587451660041
Total Variance:  21.1475
Percent:  2.77787757437

在我的真实数据集上(我觉得不合适!):

Sum of variances:  0.0188124746402
Total Variance:  0.00313754329764
Percent:  599.592510943
Unique clusters:  set([0, 1, 2, 3])

Sum of variances:  0.0255808508714
Total Variance:  0.00313754329764
Percent:  815.314672809
Unique clusters:  set([0, 1, 2, 3, 4])

Sum of variances:  0.0588210052519
Total Variance:  0.00313754329764
Percent:  1874.74720416
Unique clusters:  set([0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5])

Sum of variances:  0.0672406353655
Total Variance:  0.00313754329764
Percent:  2143.09824556
Unique clusters:  set([0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6])

Sum of variances:  0.0646291452839
Total Variance:  0.00313754329764
Percent:  2059.86465055
Unique clusters:  set([0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7])

Sum of variances:  0.0817517362176
Total Variance:  0.00313754329764
Percent:  2605.5970695
Unique clusters:  set([0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8])

Sum of variances:  0.0912820650486
Total Variance:  0.00313754329764
Percent:  2909.34837831
Unique clusters:  set([0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9])

Sum of variances:  0.102119601368
Total Variance:  0.00313754329764
Percent:  3254.76309585
Unique clusters:  set([0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10])

Sum of variances:  0.125549475536
Total Variance:  0.00313754329764
Percent:  4001.52168834
Unique clusters:  set([0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11])

Sum of variances:  0.138469402779
Total Variance:  0.00313754329764
Percent:  4413.30651542
Unique clusters:  set([0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12])

最佳答案

失真，至Kmeans是，被用作停止标准(如果两次迭代之间的变化小于某个阈值，我们假设收敛)

如果您想从一组点和质心计算它，您可以执行以下操作(代码在 MATLAB 中使用 pdist2 函数，但在 Python/Numpy/Scipy 中重写应该很简单): 

% data
X = [0 1 ; 0 -1 ; 1 0 ; -1 0 ; 9 9 ; 9 10 ; 9 8 ; 10 9 ; 10 8];

% centroids
C = [9 8 ; 0 0];

% euclidean distance from each point to each cluster centroid
D = pdist2(X, C, 'euclidean');

% find closest centroid to each point, and the corresponding distance
[distortions,idx] = min(D,[],2);

结果:

% total distortion
>> sum(distortions)
ans =
           9.4142135623731

编辑#1:

我有时间玩这个。这是一个应用在 'Fisher Iris Dataset' 上的 KMeans 聚类示例。 (4 个功能，150 个实例)。我们迭代 k=1..10，绘制肘部曲线，选择 K=3 作为聚类数，并显示结果的散点图。

请注意，在给定点和质心的情况下，我包含了多种计算聚类内方差(失真)的方法。 scipy.cluster.vq.kmeans函数默认返回此度量(使用欧几里得计算作为距离度量)。您也可以使用 scipy.spatial.distance.cdist使用您选择的函数计算距离的函数(前提是您使用相同的距离度量获得了簇质心:@Denis 有一个解决方案)，然后从中计算失真。

import numpy as np
from scipy.cluster.vq import kmeans,vq
from scipy.spatial.distance import cdist
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt

# load the iris dataset
fName = 'C:\\Python27\\Lib\\site-packages\\scipy\\spatial\\tests\\data\\iris.txt'
fp = open(fName)
X = np.loadtxt(fp)
fp.close()

##### cluster data into K=1..10 clusters #####
K = range(1,10)

# scipy.cluster.vq.kmeans
KM = [kmeans(X,k) for k in K]
centroids = [cent for (cent,var) in KM]   # cluster centroids
#avgWithinSS = [var for (cent,var) in KM] # mean within-cluster sum of squares

# alternative: scipy.cluster.vq.vq
#Z = [vq(X,cent) for cent in centroids]
#avgWithinSS = [sum(dist)/X.shape[0] for (cIdx,dist) in Z]

# alternative: scipy.spatial.distance.cdist
D_k = [cdist(X, cent, 'euclidean') for cent in centroids]
cIdx = [np.argmin(D,axis=1) for D in D_k]
dist = [np.min(D,axis=1) for D in D_k]
avgWithinSS = [sum(d)/X.shape[0] for d in dist]

##### plot ###
kIdx = 2

# elbow curve
fig = plt.figure()
ax = fig.add_subplot(111)
ax.plot(K, avgWithinSS, 'b*-')
ax.plot(K[kIdx], avgWithinSS[kIdx], marker='o', markersize=12, 
    markeredgewidth=2, markeredgecolor='r', markerfacecolor='None')
plt.grid(True)
plt.xlabel('Number of clusters')
plt.ylabel('Average within-cluster sum of squares')
plt.title('Elbow for KMeans clustering')

# scatter plot
fig = plt.figure()
ax = fig.add_subplot(111)
#ax.scatter(X[:,2],X[:,1], s=30, c=cIdx[k])
clr = ['b','g','r','c','m','y','k']
for i in range(K[kIdx]):
    ind = (cIdx[kIdx]==i)
    ax.scatter(X[ind,2],X[ind,1], s=30, c=clr[i], label='Cluster %d'%i)
plt.xlabel('Petal Length')
plt.ylabel('Sepal Width')
plt.title('Iris Dataset, KMeans clustering with K=%d' % K[kIdx])
plt.legend()

plt.show()

elbow_curve scatter_plot

编辑#2:

作为对评论的回应，我在下面给出了另一个使用 NIST hand-written digits dataset 的完整示例:它有 1797 个从 0 到 9 的数字图像，每个大小为 8×8 像素。我重复上面的实验稍作修改:Principal Components Analysis用于将维数从 64 降到 2:

import numpy as np
from scipy.cluster.vq import kmeans
from scipy.spatial.distance import cdist,pdist
from sklearn import datasets
from sklearn.decomposition import RandomizedPCA
from matplotlib import pyplot as plt
from matplotlib import cm

##### data #####
# load digits dataset
data = datasets.load_digits()
t = data['target']

# perform PCA dimensionality reduction
pca = RandomizedPCA(n_components=2).fit(data['data'])
X = pca.transform(data['data'])

##### cluster data into K=1..20 clusters #####
K_MAX = 20
KK = range(1,K_MAX+1)

KM = [kmeans(X,k) for k in KK]
centroids = [cent for (cent,var) in KM]
D_k = [cdist(X, cent, 'euclidean') for cent in centroids]
cIdx = [np.argmin(D,axis=1) for D in D_k]
dist = [np.min(D,axis=1) for D in D_k]

tot_withinss = [sum(d**2) for d in dist]  # Total within-cluster sum of squares
totss = sum(pdist(X)**2)/X.shape[0]       # The total sum of squares
betweenss = totss - tot_withinss          # The between-cluster sum of squares

##### plots #####
kIdx = 9        # K=10
clr = cm.spectral( np.linspace(0,1,10) ).tolist()
mrk = 'os^p<dvh8>+x.'

# elbow curve
fig = plt.figure()
ax = fig.add_subplot(111)
ax.plot(KK, betweenss/totss*100, 'b*-')
ax.plot(KK[kIdx], betweenss[kIdx]/totss*100, marker='o', markersize=12, 
    markeredgewidth=2, markeredgecolor='r', markerfacecolor='None')
ax.set_ylim((0,100))
plt.grid(True)
plt.xlabel('Number of clusters')
plt.ylabel('Percentage of variance explained (%)')
plt.title('Elbow for KMeans clustering')

# show centroids for K=10 clusters
plt.figure()
for i in range(kIdx+1):
    img = pca.inverse_transform(centroids[kIdx][i]).reshape(8,8)
    ax = plt.subplot(3,4,i+1)
    ax.set_xticks([])
    ax.set_yticks([])
    plt.imshow(img, cmap=cm.gray)
    plt.title( 'Cluster %d' % i )

# compare K=10 clustering vs. actual digits (PCA projections)
fig = plt.figure()
ax = fig.add_subplot(121)
for i in range(10):
    ind = (t==i)
    ax.scatter(X[ind,0],X[ind,1], s=35, c=clr[i], marker=mrk[i], label='%d'%i)
plt.legend()
plt.title('Actual Digits')
ax = fig.add_subplot(122)
for i in range(kIdx+1):
    ind = (cIdx[kIdx]==i)
    ax.scatter(X[ind,0],X[ind,1], s=35, c=clr[i], marker=mrk[i], label='C%d'%i)
plt.legend()
plt.title('K=%d clusters'%KK[kIdx])

plt.show()

elbow_curve digits_centroids PCA_compare

您可以看到一些集群实际上如何对应可区分的数字，而另一些则不匹配单个数字。

注意:K-means 的实现包含在 scikit-learn 中(以及许多其他聚类算法和各种clustering metrics)。 Here是另一个类似的例子。

关于python - 计算k-means的方差百分比？，我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6645895/

上一篇：python - Python TestCase 中的非测试方法

下一篇：Python - 覆盖 __init__ 的最干净方法，其中在 super() 调用之后必须使用可选的 kwarg？

相关文章：

Python:在三个字符的子字符串中切片字符串

python - 如何更新 tkinter 中的文本框 'live'？

python - 在 celery 任务上禁用缓存

python - 如何为图表上的函数之一设置域？

python - 使用 python 拟合经验分布

python - 获取 "AttributeError: ' float'对象没有属性 'replace'“替换字符串时出错

python - 改善 python numpy 代码的运行时间

python - 压缩文件上的高效 numpy.fromfile？

statistics - 如何从数据表中计算多变量公式

python - 计算每列的统计数据并将其添加到空数据框

©2024 IT工具网  联系我们