我知道这种行为的起源,因为它已经在 SO 的多个帖子中得到了很好的解释,一些值得注意的例子是:
Why is iostream::eof inside a loop condition considered wrong?
Use getline() without setting failbit
std::getline throwing when it hits eof
C++ istream EOF does not guarantee failbit?
它也包含在 std::getline
standard 中:
3) If no characters were extracted for whatever reason (not even the discarded delimiter), getline sets failbit and returns.
我的问题是如何处理这种行为,您希望您的流捕获所有情况下的 failbit
异常,但到达 eof
引起的情况除外,最后一行为空的文件。有什么明显的东西是我遗漏的吗?
MWE:
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
#include <fstream>
#include <sstream>
void f(const std::string & file_name, char comment) {
std::ifstream file(file_name);
file.exceptions(file.failbit);
try {
std::string line;
while (std::getline(file, line).good()) {
// empty getline sets failbit throwing an exception
if ((line[0] != comment) && (line.size() != 0)) {
std::stringstream ss(line);
// do stuff
}
}
}
catch (const std::ios_base::failure& e) {
std::cerr << "Caught an ios_base::failure.\n"
<< "Explanatory string: " << e.what() << '\n'
<< "Error code: " << e.code() << '\n';
}
}
int main() {
f("example.txt", '#');
}
example.txt 是一个制表符分隔的文件,最后一行只有 \n
字符:
# This is a text file meant for testing
0 9
1 8
2 7
编辑:
while(std::getline(file, line).good()){...}
复制了问题。
最佳答案
另一种避免设置failbit
的方法是简单地重构您的if
测试以检测空行 的读取。因为在这种情况下这是你的最后一行,你可以简单地 return
以避免抛出错误,例如:
std::ifstream file (file_name);
file.exceptions (file.failbit);
try {
std::string line;
while (std::getline(file, line)) {
// detect empty line and return
if (line.size() == 0)
return;
if (line[0] != comment) {
std::stringstream ss(line);
// do stuff
}
}
}
...
您的另一种选择是检查eofbit
是否在catch
中设置。如果设置了 eofbit
——读取成功完成。例如
catch (const std::ios_base::failure& e) {
if (!file.eof())
std::cerr << "Caught an ios_base::failure.\n"
<< "Explanatory string: " << e.what() << '\n'
<< "Error code: " /* << e.code() */ << '\n';
}
关于c++ - getline 设置 failbit 和 eof,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/50662874/