我想采用递增的数字序列(例如一系列时间)
set.seed(41); d <- seq(1:100) + runif(100, 0, 1)
如果两个连续数字之间的差异低于阈值,则通过取两者的平均值将它们合并为一个点,然后继续进行直到下一次需要合并为止。我求助于我通常避免使用的函数:while
和 ifelse
来编写一个快速而肮脏的函数,它可以工作,但速度不快。您能否更有效地解决此任务 2)而不调用 for 或 while 循环。是否有一些内置函数(也许具有更多功能)非常适合此类任务?
combine_points <- function(x, th=0.5)
{
i = 1 # start i at 1
while(min(diff(x)) < th) # initiate while loop
{
ifelse(x[i+1] - x[i] < th, # logical condition
x[i] <- x[i+1] <-
mean(c(x[i+1], x[i])), # assignment if TRUE
(x[i] <- x[i])) # assignment if FALSE
x <- sort(unique(x)) # get rid of the duplicated entry created when
# the ifelse statement was TRUE
# increment i or reset i to 1 if it gets too large
ifelse(i == length(x), i <- 1, i <- i+1 )
}
return(x)
}
newd <- combine_points(d)
th <- 0.5
which(diff(newd) < th)
integer(0)
更新迄今为止的解决方案基准。
我使用更大的样本向量进行了基准测试,当向量变长时,@Roland 建议的 Rcpp 解决方案比我的第一个 while 循环慢。我对最初的 while 循环进行了改进,并制作了它的 Rcpp 版本。基准测试结果如下。请注意,@flodel 答案不能直接比较,因为它是一种根本不同的组合方法,但它绝对非常快。
set.seed(41); d <- seq(1:4000) + runif(4000, 0, 1)
library(microbenchmark)
microbenchmark(
combine_points.Frank(d,th=0.5),
combine_points.Frank2(d,th=0.5),
combine_points_Roland(d,th=0.5),
combine_points_Roland2(d,th=0.5))
Unit: milliseconds
expr min lq median uq max neval
combine_points.Frank(d, th = 0.5) 2115.6391 2154.5038 2174.5889 2193.8444 7884.1638 100
combine_points.Frank2(d, th = 0.5) 1298.2923 1323.2214 1341.5357 1357.4260 15538.0872 100
combine_points_Roland(d, th = 0.5) 2497.9106 2506.5960 2512.3591 2519.0036 2573.2854 100
combine_points_Roland2(d, th = 0.5) 494.8406 497.3613 498.2347 499.8777 544.9743 100
这比我的第一次尝试有了很大的进步,下面是 Rcpp 版本,这是迄今为止最快的:
combine_points.Frank2 <- function(x, th=0.5)
{
i = 1
while(min(diff(x)) < th)
{
if(x[i+1] - x[i] >= th){
i <- i + 1}
else {
x[i] <- x[i+1] <-
mean(c(x[i+1], x[i]));x <- unique(x); i <- i }
}
return(x)
}
Rcpp版本
cppFunction('
NumericVector combine_points_Roland2(NumericVector x, double th) {
int i=0;
while(min(diff(x)) < th)
{
if ((x[i+1] - x[i]) >= th)
{
i = i + 1;
}
else{
x[i] = (x[i+1] + x[i])/2;
x[i+1] = x[i];
x = sort_unique(x);
i = i;
}
}
return x;
}
')
最佳答案
这是更快的东西。它避免了在循环中调整/复制 x
的大小。
#include <Rcpp.h>
using namespace Rcpp;
// [[Rcpp::export]]
NumericVector combine_points_Roland3(NumericVector x, double th) {
int i=0, j;
int n(x.size());
while(i < n-1)
{
if ((x[i+1] - x[i]) >= th)
{
i = i + 1;
}
else{
x[i] = (x[i+1] + x[i])/2;
n = n-1;
for (j=i+1; j<n; j++)
{
x[j]=x[j+1];
}
}
}
NumericVector y(n);
for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
y[i] = x[i];
}
return y;
}
相同算法的 R 实现:
combine_points_Roland3R <- function(x, th) {
i <- 1
n <- length(x)
while(i < n) {
if ((x[i+1] - x[i]) >= th) {
i <- i + 1;
} else {
x[i] <- (x[i+1] + x[i])/2
n <- n-1
x[(i+1):n] <- x[(i+2):(n+1)]
}
}
x[1:n]
}
set.seed(41); d <- seq(1:4000) + runif(4000, 0, 1)
x2 <- combine_points_Roland2(d, 0.5)
x3 <- combine_points_Roland3(d, 0.5)
all.equal(x2, x3)
#TRUE
x4 <- combine_points_Roland3R(d, 0.5)
all.equal(x2, x4)
#TRUE
基准:
library(microbenchmark)
microbenchmark(combine_points_Roland2(d, 0.5),
combine_points_Roland3(d, 0.5),
combine_points_Roland3R(d, 0.5))
# Unit: microseconds
# expr min lq median uq max neval
# combine_points_Roland2(d, 0.5) 126458.64 131414.592 132355.4285 133422.2235 147306.728 100
# combine_points_Roland3(d, 0.5) 121.34 128.269 140.8955 143.3595 393.582 100
# combine_points_Roland3R(d, 0.5) 17564.24 18626.878 19155.6565 20910.2935 68707.888 100
关于R:当差异低于某个阈值时的平均序列值,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/22579663/