我想用另一个列表中间的值替换一个列表中间的值。如果它介于 0 和 1 之间,您就知道它位于中间。我希望最好以最低的大复杂度来执行此操作,因为我想重复它数千次
l1 = [0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0,0.0, 0.3,0.4,0.4,0.5,0.6, 1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0,1.0]
#l1 is a list of numbers with unique values that are not 0.0 or 1.0 in the middle
l2 = [0.0,0.1,0.1,0.1,0.1, 0.1,0.2,0.3,0.4,0.4, 0.5,0.5,0.6,0.6,0.7,0.7,0.8,0.8,0.9,0.9]
#I want to replace the above middle values of l1 to the middle values of l2 to get l3
l3 = [0.0,0.1,0.1,0.1,0.1, 0.3,0.4,0.4,0.5,0.6, 0.5,0.5,0.6,0.6,0.7,0.7,0.8,0.8,0.9,0.9]
#given that I know nothing about how many middle values there are or where they are
编辑:列表是固定长度并排序的
edit2:这是我丑陋的解决方案。可以改进吗?
stop0 = -1
stop0bool = True
stop1 = -1
for i in range(20):
if stop0bool and l1[i] != 0.0:
stop0 = i
stop0bool = False
if l1[i] == 1.0:
stop1 = i
break;
l3 = l2[0:stop0] + l1[stop0:stop1] + l2[stop1:20]
最佳答案
对于具有数百个元素的列表NumPy应该会给你带来显着的性能提升。
对于以下示例数据:
import numpy as np
size = 500
x, y = 10, 486
a = np.sort(np.random.rand(size))
a[:x] = 0
a[y:] = 1
b = np.sort(np.random.rand(size))
使用 boolean array indexing就地替换可将速度提高约 10 倍:
mask = (a > 0) & (a < 1)
b[mask] = a[mask]
# 4.5 µs ± 23.3 ns per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100000 loops each)
与您的解决方案相比:
# 74 µs ± 61.6 ns per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 10000 loops each)
关于python - 从一个列表替换另一个列表中间的值,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/59029029/