我有一段代码。该代码用于学习CompletableFuture
。
package com.test.omn.hello;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture;
import java.util.stream.Collectors;
public class CompletableFutureLearning {
public static void main(String[] args) {
List<Shop> shops = new ArrayList<>();
shops.add(new Shop("Videocon Tv", "100 $"));
shops.add(new Shop("Videocon Tv", "200 $"));
shops.add(new Shop("Videocon Tv", "300 $"));
shops.add(new Shop("Videocon Tv", "400 $"));
long start_time;
long end_time;
double difference;
System.out.println("parallel stream");
start_time = System.nanoTime();
shops.parallelStream().forEach(e -> System.out.println(e.getPrice()));
end_time = System.nanoTime();
difference = (end_time - start_time) / 1e6;
System.out.println("execution time " + difference);
System.out.println("completable futures stream");
start_time = System.nanoTime();
List<CompletableFuture<String>> result = shops.parallelStream()
.map(shop -> CompletableFuture.supplyAsync(() -> shop.getPrice())).collect(Collectors.toList());
List<String> result1 = result.parallelStream().map(CompletableFuture::join).collect(Collectors.toList());
result1.forEach(e -> System.out.println(e));
end_time = System.nanoTime();
difference = (end_time - start_time) / 1e6;
System.out.println("execution time " + difference);
}
static public class Shop {
public Shop(String name, String price) {
super();
this.name = name;
this.price = price;
}
private String name;
private String price;
public String getName() {
return name;
}
public void setName(String name) {
this.name = name;
}
public String getPrice() {
try {
Thread.sleep(3000l);
} catch (InterruptedException e) {
}
return price;
}
public void setPrice(String price) {
this.price = price;
}
}
}
以下是我运行代码时的结果。我可以看到并行流的执行时间总是比 CompletableFuture 的执行时间快。我希望执行时间或多或少相似。知道为什么会发生这种情况吗?
parallel stream
300 $
400 $
100 $
200 $
execution time 3079.88547
completable futures stream
100 $
200 $
300 $
400 $
execution time 6018.84133
最佳答案
我认为在第二个例子中,这里:
List<String> result1 = result.parallelStream().map(CompletableFuture::join).collect(Collectors.toList());
您通过单独的线程执行两次包装代码:一次是在执行parallelStream时,第二次是在调用CompletableFuture::join(正在调用已经异步 CompletableFuture)时。
考虑按流交换第二个扇区中的parallelStream:
List<String> result1 = result.stream().map(CompletableFuture::join).collect(Collectors.toList());
附注在我的机器上,多次运行后的结果几乎相同:
parallel stream
300 $
400 $
200 $
100 $
execution time 3007.854272
completable futures stream
100 $
200 $
300 $
400 $
execution time 3006.914028
也许在您的情况下,公共(public)线程池中的线程数量小于情况 #2 所需的线程数量,因此像我考虑的那样更改代码应该可以解决问题。
关于java - 为什么具有可完成 future 的代码比并行流慢?,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/59345824/