struct Y { };
struct X : std::tuple<Y> { };
int main()
{
std::get<0>(std::make_tuple(X{}));
}
当使用 libc++ 时,上面的代码可以通过 clang++
编译并按预期工作。
当使用 libstdc++ 时,上述代码无法同时使用 clang++
和 g++
进行编译,并出现以下错误:
include/c++/7.0.1/tuple:1302:36:
error: no matching function for call to ‘__get_helper<0>(std::tuple<X>&)’
{ return std::__get_helper<__i>(__t); }
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~
include/c++/7.0.1/tuple:1290:5:
note: candidate: template<long unsigned int __i, class _Head, class ... _Tail>
constexpr _Head& std::__get_helper(std::_Tuple_impl<_Idx, _Head, _Tail ...>&)
__get_helper(_Tuple_impl<__i, _Head, _Tail...>& __t) noexcept
^~~~~~~~~~~~
include/c++/7.0.1/tuple:1290:5:
note: template argument deduction/substitution failed:
include/c++/7.0.1/tuple:1302:36:
note: ‘std::_Tuple_impl<0, _Head, _Tail ...>’ is an ambiguous base class of ‘std::tuple<X>’
{ return std::__get_helper<__i>(__t); }
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~
include/c++/7.0.1/tuple:1295:5:
note: candidate: template<long unsigned int __i, class _Head, class ... _Tail>
constexpr const _Head& std::__get_helper(const std::_Tuple_impl<_Idx, _Head, _Tail ...>&)
__get_helper(const _Tuple_impl<__i, _Head, _Tail...>& __t) noexcept
^~~~~~~~~~~~
include/c++/7.0.1/tuple:1295:5:
note: template argument deduction/substitution failed:
include/c++/7.0.1/tuple:1302:36:
note: ‘const std::_Tuple_impl<0, _Head, _Tail ...>’ is an ambiguous base class of ‘std::tuple<X>’
{ return std::__get_helper<__i>(__t); }
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~
当元组元素派生自 std::tuple
时,libstdc++ 的 std::tuple
的基于继承的实现似乎会导致歧义在调用 std::get
时。我倾向于认为这是 libstdc++ 中的一个实现缺陷 - 是这样吗?还是标准中有什么东西会使代码片段格式错误?
最佳答案
如 T.C. 所述在评论中,这是由 known bug #71096 引起的.
关于c++ - 使用派生自 `std::get` 的元素在 `std::tuple` 上调用 `std::tuple` - 格式错误?,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/41990514/