问题:
在 BigQuery 中,标准 SQL,如果我运行
SELECT *
FROM mytable
CROSS JOIN UNNEST(mytable.array)
我可以确定生成的行顺序与数组顺序相同吗?
示例:
假设我有下表mytable
:
Row | id | prediction
1 | abcd | [0.2, 0.5, 0.3]
如果我运行 SELECT * FROM mytable CROSS JOIN UNNEST(mytable.prediction)
,我可以确定行顺序与数组顺序相同吗? IE。结果表是否总是:
Row | id | unnested_prediction
1 | abcd | 0.2
2 | abcd | 0.5
3 | abcd | 0.3
更多用例背景(argmax):
我正在尝试在每行 (argmax) 中查找数组中具有最大值的数组索引,即上面数组中的第二个元素 (0.5
)。因此,我的目标输出是这样的:
Row | id | argmax
1 | abcd | 2
使用 CROSS JOIN
、一个由 prediction
值排序的 DENSE_RANK
窗口函数和一个 ROW_NUMBER
窗口函数来找到 argmax,我可以使用一些测试数据来完成这项工作。您可以使用此查询进行验证:
WITH predictions AS (
SELECT 'abcd' AS id, [0.2, 0.5, 0.3] AS prediction
UNION ALL
SELECT 'efgh' AS id, [0.7, 0.2, 0.1] AS prediction
),
ranked_predictions AS (
SELECT
id,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY id) AS rownum, -- This is the ordering I'm curious about
DENSE_RANK() OVER (PARTITION BY id ORDER BY flattened_prediction DESC) AS array_rank
FROM
predictions P
CROSS JOIN
UNNEST(P.prediction) AS flattened_prediction
)
SELECT
id,
rownum AS argmax
FROM
ranked_predictions
WHERE array_rank = 1
ROW_NUMBER
在我的测试中表现良好(即它根据未嵌套数组排序)可能只是巧合,所以很高兴能确定。
最佳答案
Can I be certain that the resulting row order is the same as the array order?
您应该使用 WITH OFFSET
来获取数组中元素的位置,这样您就可以使用它们在您的进一步逻辑中进行排序
#standardSQL
WITH `project.dataset.table` AS (
SELECT 'abcd' id, [0.2, 0.5, 0.3] prediction
)
SELECT id, unnested_prediction
FROM `project.dataset.table`,
UNNEST(prediction) unnested_prediction WITH OFFSET pos
ORDER BY id, pos
关于arrays - BigQuery 参数最大值 : Is array order maintained when doing CROSS JOIN UNNEST,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/53635020/