为什么我在类的第一个实现中出现反序列化异常“未找到反序列化类型为‘SerializeTest.TryMe’的对象的构造函数”,但在第二个实现中却没有?
第一次实现:
[Serializable]
public class TryMe : IDictionary<int, string>
{
Dictionary<int, string> _dictionary = new Dictionary<int, string>();
public TryMe() {}
public IEnumerator<KeyValuePair<int, string>> GetEnumerator()
{
return _dictionary.GetEnumerator();
}
// all other IDictionary members are implemented below...
......
}
第二次实现:
[Serializable]
public class TryMe : Dictionary<int, string>
{
public int Dummy { get; set; } = 5;
public TryMe() {}
}
序列化/反序列化代码:
var tryMe = new TryMe();
tryMe[5] = "a"; tryMe[9] = "b"; tryMe[4] = "c";
using (var fs = new FileStream(@"D:\11.obj", FileMode.Create))
{
var formatter = new BinaryFormatter();
formatter.Serialize(fs, tryMe);
}
tryMe = null;
using (var fs = new FileStream(@"D:\11.obj", FileMode.Open))
{
var formatter = new BinaryFormatter();
tryMe = (TryMe)formatter.Deserialize(fs); // Exception here with 2nd implementation of TryMe!!
}
还有其他序列化问题,我应该在什么时候继承 IDictionary
以及什么时候继承 Dictionary
?
是否有规范的方式/规则?
最佳答案
问题:
Why am I getting deserialization exception "The constructor to deserialize an object of type 'SerializeTest.TryMe' was not found" in the first implementation of class but not in the second?
答案:
接口(interface)文档 ISerializable
说:
The
ISerializable
interface implies a constructor with the signatureconstructor (SerializationInfo information, StreamingContext context)
. At deserialization time, the current constructor is called only after the data in theSerializationInfo
has been deserialized by the formatter.
(我们将 constructor (SerializationInfo information, StreamingContext context)
称为反序列化构造函数。)
所以从文档中我们知道对于实现 ISerializable
的类反序列化构造函数是必需的。
类 Dictionary<TKey, TValue>
工具 ISerializable
和你的类(class)TryMe
(来自第二个示例)继承 Dictionary<TKey, TValue>
.在反序列化期间,反序列化器考虑 TryMe
作为实现 ISerializable
的类并寻找反序列化构造函数。反序列化器找不到它并抛出异常。
接口(interface) IDictionary<TKey, TValue>
不执行ISerializable
因此不需要反序列化构造函数。在这种情况下 TryMe
可以在没有反序列化构造函数的情况下反序列化。不抛出异常。
问题:
Also other then serialization issue when should I prefer to inherit IDictionary and when Dictionary?
Is there a canonical way/rule for this?
答案:
对于序列化,可以继承 Dictionary<TKey, TValue>
或 IDictionary<TKey, TValue>
.但是如果你继承Dictionary<TKey, TValue>
必须将反序列化构造函数添加到您的类中。
您应该什么时候继承 IDictionary<TKey, TValue>
什么时候Dictionary<TKey, TValue>
? 这取决于您解决的问题。一般我们可以考虑两种情况:
- 如果您需要使用自定义实现一个类
IDictionary<TKey, TValue>
Dictionary<TKey, TValue>
的功能和功能不满足您的要求,您更愿意继承IDictionary<TKey, TValue>
. - 如果
Dictionary<TKey, TValue>
的功能满足您的要求,并且您可以选择更改或添加您自己的功能,而不是您希望继承的功能Dictionary<TKey, TValue>
.
如果你实现 IDictionary<TKey, TValue>
通过将适当的方法委托(delegate)给 Dictionary<TKey, TValue>
就像在您的第一个示例中一样,您可能不需要实现 IDictionary<TKey, TValue>
.在这种情况下,您应该继承 Dictionary<TKey, TValue>
.
// Sample, when it is better to inherit Dictionary<TKey, TValue>
// instead of implementing IDictionary<TKey, TValue>.
[Serializable]
public class TryMe : IDictionary<int, string>
{
Dictionary<int, string> _dictionary = new Dictionary<int, string>();
public IEnumerator<KeyValuePair<int, string>> GetEnumerator()
{
return _dictionary.GetEnumerator();
}
public string this[key]
{
get { return _dictionary[key]; }
}
// Other IDictionary<TKey, TValue> members are implemented the same way.
}
关于从Dictionary继承的对象上的C#反序列化异常,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/60824181/