我正在将对象的平面层次结构转换为基于父 Node ID 的嵌套对象。
问题是,当我输入更复杂的结构(更多更深的子结构)时,该过程需要很长时间才能完成。
也许这与内存或其他递归或冗余的低效使用有关?我不确定。
代码:
const people = [
{
id: '738a8f8a',
parentNode: null
},
{
id: 'd18fd69c',
parentNode: '738a8f8a'
},
{
id: 'b507c11d',
parentNode: '738a8f8a'
},
{
id: '171d4709',
parentNode: 'b507c11d'
},
{
id: '471b1cee',
parentNode: 'b507c11d'
}
];
function getBase(base) {
for (const person of base) {
if (person['parentNode'] === null) {
return person;
}
}
return null;
}
function getChildren(parent) {
const values = people.filter((person) => {
return person['parentNode'] === parent['id'];
});
return Object.values(values);
}
function buildHierarchy(base = null) {
if (base === null) {
base = getBase(people);
if (base === null) {
return null;
}
}
const children = getChildren(base).map((child) => {
return buildHierarchy(child);
});
base['childrenNodes'] = children;
return base;
}
console.log(buildHierarchy());
以及上面console.log的输出:
{
id: '738a8f8a',
parentNode: null
childrenNodes: [
{
id: 'd18fd69c',
parentNode: '738a8f8a',
childrenNodes: [],
},
{
id: 'b507c11d',
parentNode: '738a8f8a',
childrenNodes: [
{
id: '171d4709',
parentNode: 'b507c11d',
childrenNodes: [],
},
{
id: '471b1cee',
parentNode: 'b507c11d',
childrenNodes: [],
},
],
},
],
};
最佳答案
While writing this answer, I saw @cbr's, and thought it was the same logic. But not entirely, and there seems to be a sensible performance difference (in Chrome at least), so I'll still post this one
我无法使用需要很长时间处理的真实数据来测试这一点,但我认为您的瓶颈是在 getChildren
函数中使用 filter
。对于每个人,您都将遍历整个 people
数组。
我认为在构建层次结构之前仅对数据进行一次预处理可以减少时间。为此,我们可以创建一个 Map ,其中每个键是一个人的 ID,值是其子级的数组。
可以这样实现:
// For each person
const childMap = people.reduce((map, person) => {
// If its parentNode is not already in the map
if (!map.has(person.parentNode)) {
// Add it
map.set(person.parentNode, []);
}
// Then, push the current person into that parent ID's children Array
map.get(person.parentNode).push(person);
return map;
}, new Map());
然后,您的 getChildren
函数将如下所示:
function getChildren(parent) {
return childMap.get(parent.id) || [];
}
这是完整的示例,连续运行 100.000 次:
const people = [
{
id: '738a8f8a',
parentNode: null
},
{
id: 'd18fd69c',
parentNode: '738a8f8a'
},
{
id: 'b507c11d',
parentNode: '738a8f8a'
},
{
id: '171d4709',
parentNode: 'b507c11d'
},
{
id: '471b1cee',
parentNode: 'b507c11d'
}
];
const childMap = people.reduce((map, person) => {
if (!map.has(person.parentNode)) {
map.set(person.parentNode, []);
}
map.get(person.parentNode).push(person);
return map;
}, new Map());
function getBase(base) {
for (const person of base) {
if (person.parentNode === null) {
return person;
}
}
return null;
}
function getChildren(parent) {
return childMap.get(parent.id) || [];
}
function buildHierarchy(base = null) {
if (base === null) {
base = getBase(people);
if (base === null) {
return null;
}
}
const children = getChildren(base);
base.childrenNodes = children.map(buildHierarchy);
return base;
}
console.time('x');
for (let i = 0; i < 100000; i++) buildHierarchy();
console.timeEnd('x');
您的代码,连续运行 100.000 次:
const people = [
{
id: '738a8f8a',
parentNode: null
},
{
id: 'd18fd69c',
parentNode: '738a8f8a'
},
{
id: 'b507c11d',
parentNode: '738a8f8a'
},
{
id: '171d4709',
parentNode: 'b507c11d'
},
{
id: '471b1cee',
parentNode: 'b507c11d'
}
];
function getBase(base) {
for (const person of base) {
if (person['parentNode'] === null) {
return person;
}
}
return null;
}
function getChildren(parent) {
const values = people.filter((person) => {
return person['parentNode'] === parent['id'];
});
return Object.values(values);
}
function buildHierarchy(base = null) {
if (base === null) {
base = getBase(people);
if (base === null) {
return null;
}
}
const children = getChildren(base).map((child) => {
return buildHierarchy(child);
});
base['childrenNodes'] = children;
return base;
}
console.time('x');
for (let i = 0; i < 100000; i++) buildHierarchy();
console.timeEnd('x');
@cbr 的代码,连续运行 100.000 次:
const people = [
{
id: "738a8f8a",
parentNode: null,
},
{
id: "d18fd69c",
parentNode: "738a8f8a",
},
{
id: "b507c11d",
parentNode: "738a8f8a",
},
{
id: "171d4709",
parentNode: "b507c11d",
},
{
id: "471b1cee",
parentNode: "b507c11d",
},
];
function buildNodeChildLookup(people) {
const nodeIdToNode = people.reduce((map, curr) => {
map.set(curr.id, curr);
return map;
}, new Map());
return people.reduce((map, curr) => {
const children = map.get(curr.parentNode) || [];
const childNode = nodeIdToNode.get(curr.id);
children.push(childNode);
map.set(curr.parentNode, children);
return map;
}, new Map());
}
function buildHierarchy(node, nodeToChildren) {
const children = nodeToChildren.get(node.id) || [];
return {
...node,
childNodes: children.map((child) => buildHierarchy(child, nodeToChildren)),
};
}
// assume only one root!
const nodeIdToChildren = buildNodeChildLookup(people);
const root = nodeIdToChildren.get(null)[0];
console.time('x');
for (let i = 0; i < 100000; i++) buildHierarchy(root, nodeIdToChildren);
console.timeEnd('x');
关于javascript - 在 Node.js 中构建多分支树时的性能问题,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/67203385/