我已经在我的数据集上实现了 Apriori 算法。我得到的规则是倒置的重复,即:
inspect(head(rules))
lhs rhs support confidence lift count
[1] {252-ON-OFF} => {L30-ATLANTIC} 0.04545455 1 22 1
[2] {L30-ATLANTIC} => {252-ON-OFF} 0.04545455 1 22 1
[3] {252-ON-OFF} => {M01-A molle biconiche} 0.04545455 1 22 1
[4] {M01-A molle biconiche} => {252-ON-OFF} 0.04545455 1 22 1
[5] {L30-ATLANTIC} => {M01-A molle biconiche} 0.04545455 1 22 1
[6] {M01-A molle biconiche} => {L30-ATLANTIC} 0.04545455 1 22 1
可以看出,规则 1 和规则 2 相同,只是 LHS 和 RHS 互换了。有没有办法从最终结果中删除这些规则?
我看到这个帖子 link但建议的解决方案是不正确的。
我也看到了这个帖子link我尝试了这两种解决方案:
解决方案一:
rules <- rules[!is.redundant(rules)]
但结果总是一样的:
inspect(head(rules))
lhs rhs support confidence lift count
[1] {252-ON-OFF} => {L30-ATLANTIC} 0.04545455 1 22 1
[2] {L30-ATLANTIC} => {252-ON-OFF} 0.04545455 1 22 1
[3] {252-ON-OFF} => {M01-A molle biconiche} 0.04545455 1 22 1
[4] {M01-A molle biconiche} => {252-ON-OFF} 0.04545455 1 22 1
[5] {L30-ATLANTIC} => {M01-A molle biconiche} 0.04545455 1 22 1
[6] {M01-A molle biconiche} => {L30-ATLANTIC} 0.04545455 1 22 1
解决方案B:
# find redundant rules
subset.matrix <- is.subset(rules, rules)
subset.matrix[lower.tri(subset.matrix, diag=T)]
redundant <- colSums(subset.matrix, na.rm=T) > 1
which(redundant)
rules.pruned <- rules[!redundant]
inspect(rules.pruned)
lhs rhs support confidence lift count
[1] {} => {BRC-BRC} 0.04545455 0.04545455 1 1
[2] {} => {111-WINK} 0.04545455 0.04545455 1 1
[3] {} => {305-INGRAM HIGH} 0.04545455 0.04545455 1 1
[4] {} => {952-REVERS} 0.04545455 0.04545455 1 1
[5] {} => {002-LC2} 0.09090909 0.09090909 1 2
[6] {} => {252-ON-OFF} 0.04545455 0.04545455 1 1
[7] {} => {L30-ATLANTIC} 0.04545455 0.04545455 1 1
[8] {} => {M01-A molle biconiche} 0.04545455 0.04545455 1 1
[9] {} => {678-Portovenere} 0.04545455 0.04545455 1 1
[10] {} => {251-MET T.} 0.04545455 0.04545455 1 1
[11] {} => {324-D.S.3} 0.04545455 0.04545455 1 1
[12] {} => {L04-YUME} 0.04545455 0.04545455 1 1
[13] {} => {969-Lubekka} 0.04545455 0.04545455 1 1
[14] {} => {000-FUORI LISTINO} 0.04545455 0.04545455 1 1
[15] {} => {007-LC7} 0.04545455 0.04545455 1 1
[16] {} => {341-COS} 0.04545455 0.04545455 1 1
[17] {} => {601-ROBIE 1} 0.04545455 0.04545455 1 1
[18] {} => {608-TALIESIN 2} 0.04545455 0.04545455 1 1
[19] {} => {610-ROBIE 2} 0.04545455 0.04545455 1 1
[20] {} => {615-HUSSER} 0.04545455 0.04545455 1 1
[21] {} => {831-DAKOTA} 0.04545455 0.04545455 1 1
[22] {} => {997-997} 0.27272727 0.27272727 1 6
[23] {} => {412-CAB} 0.09090909 0.09090909 1 2
[24] {} => {S01-A doghe senza movimenti} 0.09090909 0.09090909 1 2
[25] {} => {708-Genoa} 0.09090909 0.09090909 1 2
[26] {} => {998-998} 0.54545455 0.54545455 1 12
有没有人遇到过同样的问题并知道如何解决?谢谢你的帮助
最佳答案
问题在于您的数据集,而不是算法。在结果中,您会看到许多规则的计数为 1(项目组合在事务中出现一次)并且该规则及其“逆”的置信度为 1。这意味着您需要更多数据并增加最低支持。
如果您仍然想有效地摆脱这种“重复”规则,那么您可以执行以下操作:
> library(arules)
> data(Groceries)
> rules <- apriori(Groceries, parameter = list(support = 0.001))
> rules
set of 410 rules
> gi <- generatingItemsets(rules)
> d <- which(duplicated(gi))
> rules[-d]
set of 385 rules
代码只保留每组规则的第一个规则,其中的项目完全相同。
关于从 Apriori 中删除倒置(反向/重复)规则会导致 R,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/47928125/