使用 Google 跟踪代码管理器(这是一个像素容器)与使用 Floodlight 代码有何不同？
跟踪代码管理器实际上是一个容器，可以根据需要加载自定义跟踪代码，而 Floodlight 代码是 跟踪 代码。但据我所知，自定义标签的加载可以由 Floodlight 本地完成，通过使用他们所谓的“动态”标签。
Floodlight Dynamic tags
Google Tag Manager
干杯!
最佳答案
这是 Google Tag Manager FAQ 的答案:
Today, many DoubleClick customers use Floodlight as both a container tag and as a conversion-tracking and remarketing tag. Because Google Tag Manager offers more versatile tag-management technology, we encourage all Floodlight users to install Google Tag Manager and migrate their existing Floodlight tags into Google Tag Manager using the built-in Floodlight template. This will make adding future Floodlight tags easier, and it will make variable collection much faster and less error-prone.
It’s important to note that Google Tag Manager does not replace the conversion-tracking and remarketing functionality of the Floodlight tag. DoubleClick users should continue to use Floodlight for these capabilities. Because of the more sophisticated container features of Google Tag Manager, we also encourage Floodlight users to migrate the tags in the Default tag section into Google Tag Manager, but to keep tags in the Publisher tag section within Floodlight to take advantage of last-click and view-through tag firing.
这是否回答你的问题？如果没有，请告诉我，我很乐意回答任何后续问题。
干杯，
劳拉
关于tags - Floodlight 和 Google 跟踪代码管理器，我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/12820263/