这个问题实际上比主题更具体,但我认为主题涵盖了我想知道的内容。
我正在审查一个项目中的一些代码,这些代码看起来像是我想要使用的东西,我看到了一些让我感兴趣的东西,因为我不确定为什么要这样做。具体来说,在 Chris Banes 的 ActionBar-PullToRefresh 中,我在 .java 中看到了这个:
package uk.co.senab.actionbarpulltorefresh.library;
import android.app.Activity;
import android.content.res.Configuration;
import android.view.View;
/**
* HeaderTransformers are what controls and update the Header View to reflect the current state
* of the pull-to-refresh interaction. They are responsible for showing and hiding the header
* view, as well as update the state.
*/
public abstract class HeaderTransformer {
/**
* Called whether the header view has been inflated from the resources
* defined in {@link Options#headerLayout}.
*
* @param activity The {@link android.app.Activity} that the header view is attached to.
* @param headerView The inflated header view.
*/
public void onViewCreated(Activity activity, View headerView) {}
/**
* Called when the header should be reset. You should update any child
* views to reflect this.
* <p/>
* You should <strong>not</strong> change the visibility of the header
* view.
*/
public void onReset() {}
/**
* Called the user has pulled on the scrollable view.
*
* @param percentagePulled value between 0.0f and 1.0f depending on how far the
* user has pulled.
*/
public void onPulled(float percentagePulled) {}
/**
* Called when a refresh has begun. Theoretically this call is similar
* to that provided from {@link uk.co.senab.actionbarpulltorefresh.library.listeners.OnRefreshListener} but is more suitable
* for header view updates.
*/
public void onRefreshStarted() {}
/**
* Called when a refresh can be initiated when the user ends the touch
* event. This is only called when {@link Options#refreshOnUp} is set to
* true.
*/
public void onReleaseToRefresh() {}
/**
* Called when the current refresh has taken longer than the time
* specified in {@link Options#refreshMinimizeDelay}.
*/
public void onRefreshMinimized() {}
/**
* Called when the Header View should be made visible, usually with an animation.
*
* @return true if the visibility has changed.
*/
public abstract boolean showHeaderView();
/**
* Called when the Header View should be made invisible, usually with an animation.
*
* @return true if the visibility has changed.
*/
public abstract boolean hideHeaderView();
/**
* Called when the Activity's configuration has changed.
*
* @param activity The {@link android.app.Activity} that the header view is attached to.
* @param newConfig New configuration.
*
* @see android.app.Activity#onConfigurationChanged(android.content.res.Configuration)
*/
public void onConfigurationChanged(Activity activity, Configuration newConfig) {}
}
我对这个文件的问题是,为什么要在这里做一个抽象类而不是接口(interface),或者做一个抽象类的目的是什么?我看到该类有两个抽象方法。我的理解是抽象方法必须在子类中定义,否则该子类也是一个抽象类,对吗?那么这是作为一个抽象类完成的,以便只强制执行这两个抽象方法吗?这是在这里做抽象类而不是接口(interface)的唯一原因吗?
最佳答案
将其设为抽象类可能有很多原因,您自己指出了其中一些原因。
在这种情况下,我的猜测是因为它是一个图书馆。 假设您有一个庞大的应用程序,并使用此类定义许多其他类。
如果通过添加新方法更新类,如果它是一个接口(interface),您的代码将无法编译,因为您的代码违反了接口(interface)的“契约”(它没有实现所有方法)。但在这种情况下,它是一个抽象类,可以定义默认行为:在这种情况下,什么也不做。这样您的应用程序就不会中断,并且可以毫无问题地进行编译。
关于java - 在没有成员变量的情况下通过实现创建抽象类有什么意义?,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/20059398/