windbg - 调试高cpu使用率

Question

关闭。这个问题不满足Stack Overflow guidelines .它目前不接受答案。












想改善这个问题吗？更新问题，使其成为 on-topic对于堆栈溢出。

7年前关闭。




Improve this question




所以我在我们的生产环境中遇到了一个问题，其中 2 个线程已经运行了 9 小时和 5 小时，它们导致 CPU 使用率保持在 99% 左右

我已经包含了来自 !Clrstack 和 kb 2000 的堆栈跟踪
我一直在 google 等上闲逛……永远，我找不到任何可以帮助我弄清楚这些线程在做什么以及为什么它们消耗这么多资源的东西

0:048> !clrstack
OS Thread Id: 0x345c (48)
ESP       EIP     
01e5f068 7c8285ec [HelperMethodFrame_1OBJ: 01e5f068] System.Threading.WaitHandle.WaitOneNative(Microsoft.Win32.SafeHandles.SafeWaitHandle, UInt32, Boolean, Boolean)
01e5f114 792b687f System.Threading.WaitHandle.WaitOne(Int64, Boolean)
01e5f130 792b6835 System.Threading.WaitHandle.WaitOne(Int32, Boolean)
01e5f144 7a9390a2 System.Net.ConnectionPool.CleanupCallback()
01e5f154 7a938fc3 System.Net.ConnectionPool.CleanupCallbackWrapper(Timer, Int32, System.Object)
01e5f184 7aa97f5f System.Net.TimerThread+TimerNode.Fire()
01e5f1cc 7a584c84 System.Net.TimerThread+TimerQueue.Fire(Int32 ByRef)
01e5f20c 7a55db8b System.Net.TimerThread.ThreadProc()
01e5f25c 792d6cf6 System.Threading.ThreadHelper.ThreadStart_Context(System.Object)
01e5f268 792f5611 System.Threading.ExecutionContext.runTryCode(System.Object)
01e5f698 79e71b4c [HelperMethodFrame_PROTECTOBJ: 01e5f698] System.Runtime.CompilerServices.RuntimeHelpers.ExecuteCodeWithGuaranteedCleanup(TryCode, CleanupCode, System.Object)
01e5f700 792f5507 System.Threading.ExecutionContext.RunInternal(System.Threading.ExecutionContext, System.Threading.ContextCallback, System.Object)
01e5f71c 792e0175 System.Threading.ExecutionContext.Run(System.Threading.ExecutionContext, System.Threading.ContextCallback, System.Object)
01e5f734 792d6c74 System.Threading.ThreadHelper.ThreadStart()
01e5f960 79e71b4c [GCFrame: 01e5f960] 
01e5fc50 79e71b4c [ContextTransitionFrame: 01e5fc50] 



0:048> kb 2000
ChildEBP RetAddr  Args to Child              
01e5edf8 7c827cfb 77e6202c 00000001 01e5ee48 ntdll!KiFastSystemCallRet
01e5edfc 77e6202c 00000001 01e5ee48 00000000 ntdll!NtWaitForMultipleObjects+0xc
01e5eea4 79f4c88a 00000001 01e5f0e4 00000001 kernel32!WaitForMultipleObjectsEx+0x11a
01e5ef0c 79f4c4bb 00000001 01e5f0e4 00000001 mscorwks!WaitForMultipleObjectsEx_SO_TOLERANT+0x6f
01e5ef2c 79f4c5c4 00000001 01e5f0e4 00000001 mscorwks!Thread::DoAppropriateAptStateWait+0x3c
01e5efb0 79f4c659 00000001 01e5f0e4 00000001 mscorwks!Thread::DoAppropriateWaitWorker+0x13c
01e5f000 79f159e8 00000001 01e5f0e4 00000001 mscorwks!Thread::DoAppropriateWait+0x40
01e5f104 792b687f 00000000 00000000 00000000 mscorwks!WaitHandleNative::CorWaitOneNative+0x156
01e5f120 792b6835 00000000 00000000 7aa3488c mscorlib_ni+0x1f687f
01e5f138 7a9390a2 00000000 21b09738 01e5f168 mscorlib_ni+0x1f6835
01e5f14c 7a938fc3 041c7bcc 00000000 00000000 System_ni+0x4f90a2
01e5f178 7aa97f5f 041c7bcc 1b790a40 1b790a40 System_ni+0x4f8fc3
01e5f1c4 7a584c84 00000000 21b09738 01e5f224 System_ni+0x657f5f
01e5f204 7a55db8b 0a62018c 0574ea00 00000000 System_ni+0x144c84
01e5f254 792d6cf6 22124c7c 01e5f270 792f5611 System_ni+0x11db8b
01e5f260 792f5611 00000000 1b790a40 01e5f280 mscorlib_ni+0x216cf6
01e5f270 79e71b4c 00000000 00000000 01e5f300 mscorlib_ni+0x235611
01e5f280 79e821b1 01e5f350 00000000 01e5f320 mscorwks!CallDescrWorker+0x33
01e5f300 79e96501 01e5f350 00000000 01e5f320 mscorwks!CallDescrWorkerWithHandler+0xa3
01e5f444 79e96534 79241ff0 01e5f578 01e5f498 mscorwks!MethodDesc::CallDescr+0x19c
01e5f460 79e96552 79241ff0 01e5f578 01e5f498 mscorwks!MethodDesc::CallTargetWorker+0x1f
01e5f478 79f8a3e1 01e5f498 57d102af 1b790a40 mscorwks!MethodDescCallSite::CallWithValueTypes+0x1a
01e5f644 79f8a536 01e5f6d4 57d1021f 22124cc4 mscorwks!ExecuteCodeWithGuaranteedCleanupHelper+0x9f
01e5f6f4 792f5507 01e5f698 0574ea6c 06cc1310 mscorwks!ReflectionInvocation::ExecuteCodeWithGuaranteedCleanup+0x10f
01e5f710 792e0175 041c7828 01e5f76c 0574ea6c mscorlib_ni+0x235507
01e5f728 792d6c74 041c7828 00000000 1b790a40 mscorlib_ni+0x220175
01e5f740 79e71b4c 77e40000 00000000 01e5f7d0 mscorlib_ni+0x216c74
01e5f750 79e821b1 01e5f820 00000000 01e5f7f0 mscorwks!CallDescrWorker+0x33
01e5f7d0 79e96501 01e5f820 00000000 01e5f7f0 mscorwks!CallDescrWorkerWithHandler+0xa3
01e5f90c 79e96534 7924290c 01e5fa68 01e5f9a0 mscorwks!MethodDesc::CallDescr+0x19c
01e5f928 79e96552 7924290c 01e5fa68 01e5f9a0 mscorwks!MethodDesc::CallTargetWorker+0x1f
01e5f940 79f3d803 01e5f9a0 57d10fc3 1b790a40 mscorwks!MethodDescCallSite::CallWithValueTypes+0x1a
01e5fb28 79e9845f 01e5fe50 1b790a40 00000000 mscorwks!ThreadNative::KickOffThread_Worker+0x192
01e5fb3c 79e983fb 01e5fdc4 01e5fbc4 79f7759b mscorwks!Thread::DoADCallBack+0x32a
01e5fbd0 79e98321 01e5fdc4 57d108e7 1b790a40 mscorwks!Thread::ShouldChangeAbortToUnload+0xe3
01e5fc0c 79fd876a 01e5fdc4 1b790a40 01e5fccc mscorwks!Thread::ShouldChangeAbortToUnload+0x30a
01e5fc1c 79fd96f9 01e5fdc4 01e5fcc0 79f7759b mscorwks!Thread::RaiseCrossContextException+0x434
01e5fccc 79fd878b 00000003 79fd8756 01e5fdc4 mscorwks!Thread::DoADCallBack+0xda
01e5fce8 79e983fb 01e5fdc4 01e5fd70 79f7759b mscorwks!Thread::DoADCallBack+0x310
01e5fd7c 79e98321 01e5fdc4 57d10953 00000000 mscorwks!Thread::ShouldChangeAbortToUnload+0xe3
01e5fdb8 79e984ad 01e5fdc4 00000003 00000000 mscorwks!Thread::ShouldChangeAbortToUnload+0x30a
01e5fde0 79f3d5d4 00000003 79f3d6e9 01e5fe50 mscorwks!Thread::ShouldChangeAbortToUnload+0x33e
01e5fdf8 79f3d6ae 00000003 79f3d6e9 01e5fe50 mscorwks!ManagedThreadBase::KickOff+0x13
01e5fe94 79f92015 1bb9e468 80a5e56d 80865927 mscorwks!ThreadNative::KickOffThread+0x269
01e5ffb8 77e64829 0014d9c0 00000000 00000000 mscorwks!Thread::intermediateThreadProc+0x49
01e5ffec 00000000 79f91fcf 0014d9c0 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x34

Answer 1

好的，所以我发现了问题
我做了一个
!clrstack -p
而不是 !do 在 system.net 部分，它揭示了有问题的线程是一个 System.net.Servicepoint 指向我们的 smtp 服务器..

google了一下，发现是这个问题
http://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=337557
也在这里描述
http://www.vbforums.com/showthread.php?t=584384
这是服务点未正确发送退出命令并断开连接的问题。他们将在 .net 4.0 中解决这个问题

现在我只需要在变通方法中编写代码以确保服务点关闭并且应该可以解决

感谢大家的帮助