我一直以为DirectCast()
在性能和内存方面相当便宜,并且基本上将其视为帮助我使用 IntelliSense 的一种方式,例如在事件处理程序中:
Public Sub myObject_EventHandler(sender As Object, e As System.EventArgs)
'Explicit casting with DirectCast
Dim myObject As myClass = DirectCast(sender, myClass)
myObject.MyProperty = "myValue"
End Sub
我认为这显然对我作为开发人员来说更好,而且对于编译的代码和产生的性能也更好,因为它启用了“早期绑定(bind)”而不是......
Public Sub myObject_EventHandler(sender As Object, e As System.EventArgs)
'No casting at all (late binding)
myObject.MyProperty = "myValue"
End Sub
...如果我正确理解了条款,它也可以编译和运行,但使用“后期绑定(bind)”。即假设
sender
实际上是 myClass
目的。关于性能、后期/早期绑定(bind)或其他任何内容,上面的第一个片段和下面的片段有什么区别:
Public Sub myObject_EventHandler(sender As Object, e As System.EventArgs)
'Implicit casting via variable declaration
Dim myObject As myClass = sender
myObject.MyProperty = "myValue"
End Sub
是显式的
DirectCast()
在编译器优化代码后调用有用/有害还是没有区别?
最佳答案
TL;DR 版本:
使用DirectCast()
而不是后期绑定(bind)或反射以获得更好的运行时性能。
这个问题对我来说非常有趣。我用 DirectCast()
对我编写的几乎所有应用程序都定期进行。我一直使用它,因为它使 IntelliSense 工作,如果我不使用 Option Strict On
那么我会在编译时出错。每隔一段时间我都会使用Option Strict Off
如果我赶时间并且正在测试设计概念,或者如果我急于为一次性问题提供快速而肮脏的解决方案。我从来没有考虑过使用它时的性能影响,因为我从来不用担心我写的东西的运行时性能。
想到这个问题让我有点好奇,所以我决定自己测试一下,看看有什么不同。我在 Visual Studio 中创建了一个新的控制台应用程序并开始工作。以下是该应用程序的完整源代码。如果您想自己查看结果,您应该可以直接复制/粘贴:
Option Strict Off
Option Explicit On
Imports System.Diagnostics
Imports System.Reflection
Imports System.IO
Imports System.Text
Module Module1
Const loopCntr As Int32 = 1000000
Const iterationCntr As Int32 = 5
Const resultPath As String = "C:\StackOverflow\DirectCastResults.txt"
Sub Main()
Dim objDirectCast As New MyObject("objDirectCast")
Dim objImplicitCasting As New MyObject("objImplicitCasting")
Dim objLateBound As New MyObject("objLateBound")
Dim objReflection As New MyObject("objReflection")
Dim objInvokeMember As New MyObject("objInvokeMember")
Dim sbElapsed As New StringBuilder : sbElapsed.Append("Running ").Append(iterationCntr).Append(" iterations for ").Append(loopCntr).AppendLine(" loops.")
Dim sbAverage As New StringBuilder : sbAverage.AppendLine()
AddHandler objDirectCast.ValueSet, AddressOf SetObjectDirectCast
AddHandler objImplicitCasting.ValueSet, AddressOf SetObjectImplictCasting
AddHandler objLateBound.ValueSet, AddressOf SetObjectLateBound
AddHandler objReflection.ValueSet, AddressOf SetObjectReflection
AddHandler objInvokeMember.ValueSet, AddressOf SetObjectInvokeMember
For Each myObj As MyObject In {objDirectCast, objImplicitCasting, objLateBound, objReflection, objInvokeMember}
Dim resultlist As New List(Of TimeSpan)
sbElapsed.AppendLine().Append("Time (seconds) elapsed for ").Append(myObj.Name).Append(" is: ")
For i = 1 To iterationCntr
Dim stpWatch As New Stopwatch
stpWatch.Start()
For _i = 0 To loopCntr
myObj.SetValue(_i)
Next
stpWatch.Stop()
sbElapsed.Append(stpWatch.Elapsed.TotalSeconds.ToString()).Append(", ")
resultlist.Add(stpWatch.Elapsed)
Console.WriteLine(myObj.Name & " is done.")
Next
Dim totalTicks As Long = 0L
resultlist.ForEach(Sub(x As TimeSpan) totalTicks += x.Ticks)
Dim averageTimeSpan As New TimeSpan(totalTicks / CLng(resultlist.Count))
sbAverage.Append("Average elapsed time for ").Append(myObj.Name).Append(" is: ").AppendLine(averageTimeSpan.ToString)
Next
Using strWriter As New StreamWriter(File.Open(resultPath, FileMode.Create, FileAccess.Write))
strWriter.WriteLine(sbElapsed.ToString)
strWriter.WriteLine(sbAverage.ToString)
End Using
End Sub
Sub SetObjectDirectCast(sender As Object, newValue As Int32)
Dim myObj As MyObject = DirectCast(sender, MyObject)
myObj.MyProperty = newValue
End Sub
Sub SetObjectImplictCasting(sender As Object, newValue As Int32)
Dim myObj As MyObject = sender
myObj.MyProperty = newValue
End Sub
Sub SetObjectLateBound(sender As Object, newValue As Int32)
sender.MyProperty = newValue
End Sub
Sub SetObjectReflection(sender As Object, newValue As Int32)
Dim pi As PropertyInfo = sender.GetType().GetProperty("MyProperty", BindingFlags.Public + BindingFlags.Instance)
pi.SetValue(sender, newValue, Nothing)
End Sub
Sub SetObjectInvokeMember(sender As Object, newValue As Int32)
sender.GetType().InvokeMember("MyProperty", BindingFlags.Instance + BindingFlags.Public + BindingFlags.SetProperty, Type.DefaultBinder, sender, {newValue})
End Sub
End Module
Public Class MyObject
Private _MyProperty As Int32 = 0
Public Event ValueSet(sender As Object, newValue As Int32)
Public Property Name As String
Public Property MyProperty As Int32
Get
Return _MyProperty
End Get
Set(value As Int32)
_MyProperty = value
End Set
End Property
Public Sub New(objName As String)
Me.Name = objName
End Sub
Public Sub SetValue(newvalue As Int32)
RaiseEvent ValueSet(Me, newvalue)
End Sub
End Class
我尝试在
Release
中运行应用程序配置以及在没有附加 Visual Studio 调试器的情况下运行发布配置。以下是输出结果:使用 Visual Studio 调试器发布:
Running 5 iterations for 1000000 loops.
Time (seconds) elapsed for objDirectCast is: 0.0214367, 0.0155618, 0.015561, 0.015544, 0.015542,
Time (seconds) elapsed for objImplicitCasting is: 0.014661, 0.0148947, 0.015051, 0.0149164, 0.0152732,
Time (seconds) elapsed for objLateBound is: 4.2572548, 4.2073932, 4.3517058, 4.480232, 4.4216707,
Time (seconds) elapsed for objReflection is: 0.3900658, 0.3833916, 0.3938861, 0.3875427, 0.4558457,
Time (seconds) elapsed for objInvokeMember is: 1.523336, 1.1675438, 1.1519875, 1.1698862, 1.2878384,
Average elapsed time for objDirectCast is: 00:00:00.0167291
Average elapsed time for objImplicitCasting is: 00:00:00.0149593
Average elapsed time for objLateBound is: 00:00:04.3436513
Average elapsed time for objReflection is: 00:00:00.4021464
Average elapsed time for objInvokeMember is: 00:00:01.2601184
不使用 Visual Studio 调试器发布:
Running 5 iterations for 1000000 loops.
Time (seconds) elapsed for objDirectCast is: 0.0073776, 0.0055385, 0.0058196, 0.0059637, 0.0057557,
Time (seconds) elapsed for objImplicitCasting is: 0.0060359, 0.0056653, 0.0065522, 0.0063639, 0.0057324,
Time (seconds) elapsed for objLateBound is: 4.4858827, 4.1643164, 4.2380467, 4.1217441, 4.1270739,
Time (seconds) elapsed for objReflection is: 0.3828591, 0.3790779, 0.3849563, 0.3852133, 0.3847144,
Time (seconds) elapsed for objInvokeMember is: 1.0869766, 1.0808392, 1.0881596, 1.1139259, 1.0811786,
Average elapsed time for objDirectCast is: 00:00:00.0060910
Average elapsed time for objImplicitCasting is: 00:00:00.0060699
Average elapsed time for objLateBound is: 00:00:04.2274128
Average elapsed time for objReflection is: 00:00:00.3833642
Average elapsed time for objInvokeMember is: 00:00:01.0902160
查看这些结果看起来好像使用
DirectCast()
与添加强制转换的编译器相比,几乎没有性能损失。但是,当依赖对象进行后期绑定(bind)时,会出现 巨大的性能下降,执行速度大大减慢。使用 System.Reflection
时,与直接转换对象相比有轻微的减速。我认为获得 PropertyInfo
是不寻常的。比使用 .InvokeMember()
快得多方法。结论:
尽可能使用
DirectCast()
或直接转换对象。应该只在需要时才使用反射。仅将后期绑定(bind)的元素用作最后的手段。不过说实话,如果你只是在这里或那里修改一个对象几次,它可能在宏伟的计划中并不重要。相反,您应该更关心这些方法如何失败以及如何防止它们这样做。例如,在
SetObjectInvokeMember()
方法,如果 sender
对象没有 MyProperty
属性,那么那段代码就会抛出异常。在 SetObjectReflection()
方法,返回的属性信息可能是 nothing
这将导致 NullReferenceException
.
关于vb.net - DirectCast 对性能和后期/早期绑定(bind)有什么影响?,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/29749832/