unit-testing - 一个测试用例似乎干扰了另一测试用例

标签 unit-testing ruby-on-rails-4 minitest worker webmock

这是在 Rails 4.0.11 上。我正在使用 minitest 和 webmock 为与 API 交互的工作人员编写测试。我的测试文件中有两个测试用例(到目前为止)。当我运行这两个测试时,第二个测试(标题中带有“成功”的测试)失败。当我注释掉通过的测试(标题中带有“重试”的测试)时,失败的测试用例通过了。测试用例似乎互相干扰,但我不知道如何干扰。

(我在这些代码示例中混淆了公司 secret 数据。嗨,老板!)

这是测试:

require 'test_helper'

class FoocorpCheckStatusWorkerTest < ActiveSupport::TestCase

  REQUEST_HEADERS = {'Accept'=>'*/*', 'Accept-Encoding'=>'gzip;q=1.0,deflate;q=0.6,identity;q=0.3', 'Content-Type'=>'text/xml', 'User-Agent'=>'Ruby'}
  EXPECTED_BODY = "<?xml version=\"1.0\" encoding=\"UTF-8\"?>\n<POSBizServices xmlns=\"http://api.foocorp.com\">\n  <POSBizServiceHeader>\n    <userId>ABC</userId>\n    <password>abc123</password>\n    <clientId>123</clientId>\n    <action>CHECKSTATUS</action>\n    <responseFormat>XML</responseFormat>\n  </POSBizServiceHeader>\n  <request>\n    <checkStatus>\n      <ecpdId>123</ecpdId>\n      <refNum>12345678</refNum>\n    </checkStatus>\n  </request>\n</POSBizServices>\n"

  def sample_response_body(order_level_status_code: '', line_level_status_code: '')

    return <<-SAMPLE_RESPONSE_BODY
      <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
      <POSBizServices xmlns="http://api.foocorp.com">
        <POSBizServiceHeader>
          <userId>ABC</userId>
          <password>abc123</password>
          <clientId>123</clientId>
          <statusCode>#{order_level_status_code}</statusCode>
          <statusDescription>2015-01-29 14:03:07 [QA13:MS_WSQA4_ONEPOS_01:01] : Request Processed Successfully</statusDescription>
          <action>CHECKSTATUS</action>
          <responseFormat>XML</responseFormat>
        </POSBizServiceHeader>
        <response>
          <statusResponse>
            <count>1</count>
            <orderStatus>
              <orderId>12345678</orderId>
              <orderDate>01/27/2015</orderDate>
              <stats>1,0</stats>
              <aceOrderNo></aceOrderNo>
              <locationCode></locationCode>
              <lineInfoList>
                <count>1</count>
                <lineStatus>
                  <lineSeq>1</lineSeq>
                  <statusCode>#{line_level_status_code}</statusCode>
                  <statusDesc>No Status Yet.</statusDesc>
                </lineStatus>
              </lineInfoList>
            </orderStatus>
          </statusResponse>
        </response>
      </POSBizServices>
    SAMPLE_RESPONSE_BODY
  end

  test "retry codes leave activity processor step in waiting state and activity in auto_processing state" do

    activity_processor_step = activity_processor_steps(:vip_vm_password_reset_step)
    activity = activity_processor_step.activity

    FoocorpVipCheckStatusWorker::STATUS_CODE_MATRIX[:retry].each do |status_code_pair|

      stub_request(:post, FOOCORP_VIP_CONFIG[:base_url]).
        with(:body => /^.*$/,
             :headers => REQUEST_HEADERS
            ).
            to_return(:status => 200, :body => sample_response_body(order_level_status_code: status_code_pair.first, line_level_status_code: status_code_pair.last), :headers => {})

      FoocorpVipCheckStatusWorker.new.perform

      activity.reload
      assert_equal("auto_processing", activity.state)

      activity_processor_step.reload
      assert_equal("waiting", activity_processor_step.state)

    end
  end

  test "success codes complete activity and activity processor step" do

    activity_processor_step = activity_processor_steps(:vip_vm_password_reset_step)
    activity = activity_processor_step.activity

    FoocorpVipCheckStatusWorker::STATUS_CODE_MATRIX[:success].each do |status_code_pair|

      stub_request(:post, FOOCORP_VIP_CONFIG[:base_url]).
        with(:body => /^.*$/,
             :headers => REQUEST_HEADERS
            ).
            to_return(:status => 200, :body => sample_response_body(order_level_status_code: status_code_pair.first, line_level_status_code: status_code_pair.last), :headers => {})

      FoocorpVipCheckStatusWorker.new.perform

      activity.reload
      assert_equal("completed", activity.state)

      activity_processor_step.reload
      assert_equal("completed", activity_processor_step.state)
    end
  end
end

这是 worker :

class FoocorpVipCheckStatusWorker
  @queue = :short_running

  # Foocorp VIP returns an order-level status code and description
  # and a line-level status code and description. The comments describing
  # the status codes in STATUS_CODE_MATRIX are from Foocorp's Docs.
  #
  # Array format for status codes is:
  # ["(order-level status code)", "(line-level status code)"]

  STATUS_CODE_MATRIX = {
    :success  => [
      ["00057", "00051"]  # Request Processed Successfully
    ],
    :retry    => [
      ["00057", "00053"], # No Status Yet
      ["00057", "00054"], # Order processed successfully but activation is pending.
      ["00099", ""],      # Unexpected error occurred during processing e.g. null pointer exception which causes thread to terminate.
      ["00059", ""],      # Server time out occurred.
      ["10009", ""],      # Back End call returned invalid agent data.
      ["10010", ""],      # Application fails to load ECPD profile details.
      ["00058", "10013"], # Backend calls fails to load Billing information for account. It may be due to some internal issue.
      ["00058", "10032"], # Exception occurred in Bulk Service write
      ["00058", "10033"], # Error occurred in Bulk Service write for reassign
      ["00058", "10040"], # Sub Account create failed
      ["00058", "10144"]  # UNABLE TO RETRIEVE CREDIT INFORMATION
    ]
  }

  def perform

    ActivityProcessorStep.where(state: "waiting").where("vip_ref_num IS NOT NULL").each do |activity_processor_step|

      client = Remote::Clients::FoocorpVipClient.new(
        :params   => {
          :ecpd_id     => activity_processor_step.activity.carrier_account.parent_account.api_access_id,
          :vip_ref_num => activity_processor_step.vip_ref_num
        }
      )
      response = client.check_status
      #TODO: Remove debugging code
      #binding.pry
      order_status_code = response.first[:order_status_code]
      order_status_desc = response.first[:order_status_desc]
      line_status_code  = response.last[:line_status_code]
      line_status_desc  = response.last[:line_status_desc]

      status_codes      = [order_status_code, line_status_code]
      response_message  = line_status_desc.present? ? line_status_desc : order_status_desc
      response_message  ||= "No status description given"

      success             = STATUS_CODE_MATRIX[:success].detect{ |codes_array| codes_array == [order_status_code, line_status_code]}.present?
      retry_status_check  = STATUS_CODE_MATRIX[:retry].detect{ |codes_array| codes_array == [order_status_code, line_status_code]}.present?
      stale_request       = retry_status_check && Time.now > (activity_processor_step.created_at + activity_processor_step.days_to_expire.days)

      if success
        activity_processor_step.update_activity_status('Complete', nil, nil, response_message)
      elsif stale_request
        activity_processor_step.update_activity_status('Failure', nil, nil, "Activity processor step expired.")
      elsif !retry_status_check
        activity_processor_step.update_activity_status('Failure', nil, nil, response_message)
      end

    end
  end
end

这是我的终端输出:

运行两个测试用例:

me@domo-kun ~/my-project (feature_foocorp_check_status_worker=)$ be rake test TEST=test/workers/foocorp_check_status_worker_test.rb 
Run options: --seed 58882

# Running tests:

.F

Fabulous tests in 2.009658s, 0.9952 tests/s, 11.4447 assertions/s.

  1) Failure:
FoocorpCheckStatusWorkerTest#test_success_codes_complete_activity_and_activity_processor_step     [/Users/steven/Development/my-company/my_company/test/workers/foocorp_check_status_worker_test.rb:86]:
Expected: "completed"
  Actual: "auto_processing"

2 tests, 23 assertions, 1 failures, 0 errors, 0 skips

注释掉第一个(“重试”)测试用例:

me@domo-kun ~/my-project (feature_foocorp_check_status_worker=)$ be rake test TEST=test/workers/foocorp_check_status_worker_test.rb 
Run options: --seed 14937

# Running tests:

.

Fabulous tests in 3.474386s, 0.2878 tests/s, 0.5756 assertions/s.

1 tests, 2 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors, 0 skips

当我一起运行两个测试并在工作线程中使用 binding.pry (此处注释掉)来检查“成功”测试用例期间 response 的值时(失败的),我得到以下两个结果。我期望在这两种情况下得到相同的结果(第二个)。

运行两个测试用例:

[1] pry(#<VerizonVipCheckStatusWorker>)> response
=> [{:order_status_code=>"00057",
  :order_status_desc=>"",
  :_summary=>{:order_status_code=>"00057", :order_status_desc=>""}},
 {:line_status_code=>"00053",
  :line_status_desc=>"No Status Yet.",
  :_summary=>{}}]

注释掉第一个(“重试”)测试用例:

[2] pry(#<VerizonVipCheckStatusWorker>)> response
=> [{:order_status_code=>"00057",
  :order_status_desc=>"",
  :_summary=>{:order_status_code=>"00057", :order_status_desc=>""}},
 {:line_status_code=>"00051",
  :line_status_desc=>"No Status Yet.",
  :_summary=>{}}]

最后一个示例中的响应值是我期望在“重试”测试用例的第一次迭代期间的值,而不是在“成功”情况下的值。

我尝试将设置方法中的内容移至您在此处看到的常量和 sample_response_body 方法中。我也尝试添加此拆卸方法,但没有帮助:

def teardown
  WebMock.reset!
end

我正在从头开始编写工作程序和测试,因此完全有可能在某个地方出现愚蠢的语法/逻辑错误。我为这个可能过于冗长的问题表示歉意,但这确实让我抓狂。感谢您的帮助。谢谢。

最佳答案

事实证明,我正在适配器类中缓存我的响应,因此它忽略了 WebMock 提供的响应。

关于unit-testing - 一个测试用例似乎干扰了另一测试用例,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/28307346/

相关文章:

unit-testing - 为单个文件生成新的代码覆盖率,而不清除 PHPUnit 中的所有其他覆盖率报告

Python单元测试: Design directory structure for mock input?

javascript - 根据其他单元测试结果执行多个 Mocha 单元测试

mysql - 选择计算 SQL 的正值/负值

mysql - 为什么某些 Rails 项目使用多个具有不同扩展名的 database.yml 文件(mysql、postgresql 等)?

ruby - Ruby Minitest 框架的前/后方法

javascript - 如何用 enzyme 测试一个方法被调用一次

ruby-on-rails - Rails 嵌套表单属性不保存

ruby - 在单个 Ruby 文件上使用 guard-minitest

ruby - 将 TESTOPTS ="-v"设置为 `rake test` 有什么意义?