我对以下命令序列感到困惑。
sh-4.2$ pwd
/home/willard
sh-4.2$ ls -l f
-rwxr-xr-x 1 willard users 59116 Jan 23 14:54 f
sh-4.2$ file f
f: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.15, BuildID[sha1]=0xea0e08ff2b5a062698d45b78177acdd6bf140d1f, stripped
sh-4.2$ ./f
sh: ./f: No such file or directory
sh-4.2$ strace ./f
execve("./f", ["./f"], [/* 32 vars */]) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
write(2, "strace: exec: No such file or di"..., 40strace: exec: No such file or directory
) = 40
exit_group(1) = ?
+++ exited with 1 +++
sh-4.2$ ls -l f
-rwxr-xr-x 1 willard users 59116 Jan 23 14:54 f
sh-4.2$ uname -a
Linux xdat10 3.6.2-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Fri Oct 12 23:58:58 CEST 2012 x86_64 GNU/Linux
这怎么可能？
最佳答案
我发现有人有同样的问题(有相关解释)
Running 32bit binary on a 64bit system
引用最重要的句子:
This situation often arises when you try to run a binary for the right system (or family of systems) and superarchitecture but the wrong subarchitecture. Here you have ELF binaries on a system that expects ELF binaries, so the kernel loads them just fine. They are i386 binaries running on an x86_64 processor, so the instructions make sense and get the program to the point where it can look for its loader. But the program is a 32-bit program (as the file output indicates), looking for the 32-bit loader /lib/ld-linux.so.2, and you've presumably only installed the 64-bit loader /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 in the chroot.
You need to install the 32-bit runtime system in the chroot: the loader, and all the libraries the programs need. On Debian amd64, the 32-bit loader is in the libc6-i386 package. You can install a bigger set of 32-bit libraries by installing ia32-libs.
我打赌有更好的方法来验证这一点，但我会尝试执行
ldd ./f
并在输出中搜索执行它所需的加载程序
关于sh - 薛定谔的文件，我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/14481554/