最少的代码:
// --------inline.h--------
struct X {
static inline void foo ();
};
#ifdef YES
inline void X::foo () { cout << "YES\n"; }
#else
inline void X::foo () { cout << "NO\n"; }
#endif
// --------file1.cpp--------
#define YES // <----
#include"inline.h"
void fun1 ()
{
X::foo();
}
// --------file2.cpp--------
#include"inline.h"
void fun2 ()
{
X::foo();
}
如果我们调用fun1()
和fun2()
,那么它们将分别打印YES
和NO
,这意味着它们引用相同 X::foo()
的不同函数体。
不管这是否应该编码,我的问题是:
这是明确定义还是未定义的行为?
最佳答案
是的,这是未定义的行为。
引用:
C++03 标准:
7.1.2 函数说明符 [dcl.fct.spec]
第 4 段:
An inline function shall be defined in every translation unit in which it is used and shall have exactly the same definition in every case (3.2). [Note: a call to the inline function may be encountered before its definition appears in the translation unit. ] If a function with external linkage is declared inline in one translation unit, it shall be declared inline in all translation units in which it appears; no diagnostic is required. An inline function with external linkage shall have the same address in all translation units. A static local variable in an extern inline function always refers to the same object. A string literal in an extern inline function is the same object in different translation units.
注意:3.2指的是一个定义规则,其中规定:
3.2 一条定义规则[basic.def.odr]
第 1 段:
No translation unit shall contain more than one definition of any variable, function, class type, enumeration type or template.
关于c++ - 对内联函数有不同的定义是未定义的行为吗?,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11200805/