我想测试这个正确记录的方法(无论是到console.error,还是你传入的记录器)。
/**
* Logs access errors in a way that is easy to quickly decipher the endpoint that was hit and the error that was received
*
* This was inspired from axios recommendation on handling errors https://www.npmjs.com/package/axios#handling-errors
*
* @param {Object | String} err The error we want to log
* @param {Object} [logger=console] An optional logger which defaults to console
* @public
* @since 5.3.0
*/
function logAxiosErr(err, logger = console) {
if (err.response) {
const error = {
error: `${err.response.status} - "${err.response.data}" with ${err.config.method.toUpperCase()} ${err.config.url}`,
headers: err.config.headers,
payload: err.config.data
}
// The request was made and the server responded with a status code that falls out of the range of 2xx
logger.error(error)
} else if (err.request) {
// The request was made but no response was received
// `error.request` is an instance of XMLHttpRequest in the browser and an instance of
// http.ClientRequest in node.js
logger.error(err.request)
} else if (err.message) {
// Something happened in setting up the request that triggered an Error
logger.error(err.message)
} else {
logger.error(err)
}
这个测试显然没有测试任何东西。我如何改进它以实际测试记录的内容是否符合我的预期?
describe('#logAxiosError', () => {
it('should log a string error ', () => {
const err = 'SOME ERROR'
expect(utils.logAxiosErr(err))
})
})
最佳答案
测试依赖关系的一种方法是为记录器创建一个 spy 对象(如果使用 jasmine)并将其传递给 logAxiosErr,然后验证对 spy 对象的期望。所以在上面的测试中
describe('#logAxiosError', () => {
it('should log a string error ', () => {
const err = 'SOME ERROR'
var logger = jasmine.createSpyObj('logger', ['error']);
utils.logAxiosErr(err, logger);
expect(logger.error).toHaveBeenCalledWith(err);
})
})
关于javascript - 如何测试登录到控制台的方法?,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/54774361/