对我来说,这有点像是一个初学者 SQL 问题,但这里是。这就是我想要做的:
- 将三个表连接在一起,产品、标签和一个链接表。
- 将标签聚合到一个逗号分隔的字段中(因此是 GROUP_CONCAT 和 GROUP BY)
- 限制结果(最多 30 个)
- 按照“创建”日期的顺序排列结果
- 尽可能避免使用子查询,因为使用 Active Record 框架编写代码特别不愉快
我已经在这篇文章的底部描述了所涉及的表,但这是我正在执行的查询
SELECT p.*, GROUP_CONCAT(pt.name)
FROM products p
LEFT JOIN product_tags_for_products pt4p ON (pt4p.product_id = p.id)
LEFT JOIN product_tags pt ON (pt.id = pt4p.product_tag_id)
GROUP BY p.id
ORDER BY p.created
LIMIT 30;
大约有 280,000 种产品、130 个标签、524,000 条链接记录,我已经分析了这些表。问题是它需要超过 80 秒才能运行(在像样的硬件上),这对我来说是错误的。
这是 EXPLAIN 的结果:
id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extra
1 SIMPLE p index NULL created 4 NULL 30 "Using temporary"
1 SIMPLE pt4p ref idx_product_tags_for_products idx_product_tags_for_products 3 s.id 1 "Using index"
1 SIMPLE pt eq_ref PRIMARY PRIMARY 4 pt4p.product_tag_id 1
我认为它以错误的顺序做事,即在连接后对结果进行排序,使用一个大的临时表,然后进行限制。我脑海中的查询计划是这样的:
- 使用“created”键对产品表进行排序
- 遍历每一行,将其与其他表进行左连接,直到达到 30 的限制。
这听起来很简单,但它似乎并不像那样工作——我是不是漏掉了什么?
CREATE TABLE `products` (
`id` mediumint(8) unsigned NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
`title` varchar(255) COLLATE utf8_unicode_ci NOT NULL,
`rating` float NOT NULL,
`created` timestamp NOT NULL DEFAULT '0000-00-00 00:00:00',
`last_modified` timestamp NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP ON UPDATE CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
`active` tinyint(1) NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
KEY `created` (`created`),
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8 COLLATE=utf8_unicode_ci
CREATE TABLE `product_tags_for_products` (
`id` bigint(20) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
`product_id` mediumint(8) unsigned NOT NULL,
`product_tag_id` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
UNIQUE KEY `idx_product_tags_for_products` (`product_id`,`product_tag_id`),
KEY `product_tag_id` (`product_tag_id`),
CONSTRAINT `product_tags_for_products_ibfk_1` FOREIGN KEY (`product_id`) REFERENCES `products` (`id`),
CONSTRAINT `product_tags_for_products_ibfk_2` FOREIGN KEY (`product_tag_id`) REFERENCES `product_tags` (`id`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8 COLLATE=utf8_unicode_ci
CREATE TABLE `product_tags` (
`id` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
`name` varchar(100) COLLATE utf8_unicode_ci NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
UNIQUE KEY `name` (`name`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8 COLLATE=utf8_unicode_ci
应 Salman A 的要求更新了分析信息:
Status,
Duration,CPU_user,CPU_system,Context_voluntary,Context_involuntary,Block_ops_in,Block_ops_out,Messages_sent,Messages_received,Page_faults_major,Page_faults_minor,Swaps,Source_function,Source_file,Source_line
starting,
0.000124,0.000106,0.000015,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,NULL,NULL,NULL
"Opening tables",
0.000022,0.000020,0.000003,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,"unknown function",sql_base.cc,4519
"System lock",
0.000007,0.000004,0.000002,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,"unknown function",lock.cc,258
"Table lock",
0.000011,0.000009,0.000002,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,"unknown function",lock.cc,269
init,
0.000055,0.000054,0.000001,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,"unknown function",sql_select.cc,2524
optimizing,
0.000008,0.000006,0.000002,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,"unknown function",sql_select.cc,833
statistics,
0.000116,0.000051,0.000066,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,"unknown function",sql_select.cc,1024
preparing,
0.000027,0.000023,0.000003,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,"unknown function",sql_select.cc,1046
"Creating tmp table",
0.000054,0.000053,0.000002,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,"unknown function",sql_select.cc,1546
"Sorting for group",
0.000018,0.000015,0.000003,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,"unknown function",sql_select.cc,1596
executing,
0.000004,0.000002,0.000001,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,"unknown function",sql_select.cc,1780
"Copying to tmp table",
0.061716,0.049455,0.013560,0,18,0,0,0,0,0,3680,0,"unknown function",sql_select.cc,1927
"converting HEAP to MyISAM",
0.046731,0.006371,0.017543,3,5,0,3,0,0,0,32,0,"unknown function",sql_select.cc,10980
"Copying to tmp table on disk",
10.700166,3.038211,1.191086,538,1230,1,31,0,0,0,65,0,"unknown function",sql_select.cc,11045
"Sorting result",
0.777887,0.155327,0.618896,2,137,0,1,0,0,0,634,0,"unknown function",sql_select.cc,2201
"Sending data",
0.000336,0.000159,0.000178,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,1,0,"unknown function",sql_select.cc,2334
end,
0.000005,0.000003,0.000002,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,"unknown function",sql_select.cc,2570
"removing tmp table",
0.106382,0.000058,0.080105,4,9,0,11,0,0,0,0,0,"unknown function",sql_select.cc,10912
end,
0.000015,0.000007,0.000007,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,"unknown function",sql_select.cc,10937
"query end",
0.000004,0.000002,0.000001,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,"unknown function",sql_parse.cc,5083
"freeing items",
0.000012,0.000012,0.000001,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,"unknown function",sql_parse.cc,6107
"removing tmp table",
0.000010,0.000009,0.000001,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,"unknown function",sql_select.cc,10912
"freeing items",
0.000084,0.000022,0.000057,0,1,0,0,1,0,0,0,0,"unknown function",sql_select.cc,10937
"logging slow query",
0.000004,0.000001,0.000001,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,"unknown function",sql_parse.cc,1723
"logging slow query",
0.000049,0.000031,0.000018,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,"unknown function",sql_parse.cc,1733
"cleaning up",
0.000007,0.000005,0.000002,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,"unknown function",sql_parse.cc,1691
表格是:
Products = 84.1MiB(产品表中有额外的字段,为清楚起见我省略了) 标签 = 32KiB 链接表 = 46.6MiB
最佳答案
我会尝试将产品数量首先限制在 30 个,然后仅加入 30 个产品:
SELECT p.*, GROUP_CONCAT(pt.name) as tags
FROM (SELECT p30.* FROM products p30 ORDER BY p30.created LIMIT 30) p
LEFT JOIN product_tags_for_products pt4p ON (pt4p.product_id = p.id)
LEFT JOIN product_tags pt ON (pt.id = pt4p.product_tag_id)
GROUP BY p.id
ORDER BY p.created
我知道您说过没有子查询,但您没有解释原因,而且我看不出有任何其他方法可以解决您的问题。
请注意,您可以通过将子选择放在 View 中来消除子选择:
CREATE VIEW v_last30products AS
SELECT p30.* FROM products p30 ORDER BY p30.created LIMIT 30;
然后查询被简化为:
SELECT p.*, GROUP_CONCAT(pt.name) as tags
FROM v_last30products p
LEFT JOIN product_tags_for_products pt4p ON (pt4p.product_id = p.id)
LEFT JOIN product_tags pt ON (pt.id = pt4p.product_tag_id)
GROUP BY p.id
ORDER BY p.created
其他问题,您的n-to-n
表product_tags_for_products
没有意义,我会像这样重组它:
CREATE TABLE `product_tags_for_products` (
`product_id` mediumint(8) unsigned NOT NULL,
`product_tag_id` int(10) unsigned NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (`product_id`,`product_tag_id`),
CONSTRAINT `product_tags_for_products_ibfk_1` FOREIGN KEY (`product_id`) REFERENCES `products` (`id`),
CONSTRAINT `product_tags_for_products_ibfk_2` FOREIGN KEY (`product_tag_id`) REFERENCES `product_tags` (`id`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8 COLLATE=utf8_unicode_ci
这应该使查询更快:
- 缩短使用的 key (在 InnoDB 上,PK 始终包含在辅助 key 中);
- 允许您使用比使用辅助 key 更快的 PK;
更多速度问题
如果您仅将 select *
替换为您需要的字段 select p.title, p.rating, ... FROM
这也会稍微加快速度。
关于mysql - 在不使用嵌套查询的情况下使用 GROUP BY 和 ORDER BY 优化 JOINed 表上的 MySQL 查询,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/7832806/