我有一个包含列 date_trans、time_trans、price 的表格。选择查询后,我想添加一个新列“Count”,它将计算为价格列的连续相等值,并且将从最终结果中删除具有连续相等价格的前几行。查看预期输出:
date_trans time_trans price **Count**
2011-02-22 09:39:59 58.02 1
2011-02-22 09:40:03 58.1 *ROW WILL BE REMOVED
2011-02-22 09:40:07 58.1 *ROW WILL BE REMOVED
2011-02-22 09:40:08 58.1 3
2011-02-22 09:40:10 58.15 1
2011-02-22 09:40:10 58.1 *ROW WILL BE REMOVED
2011-02-22 09:40:14 58.1 2
2011-02-22 09:40:24 58.15 1
2011-02-22 09:40:24 58.18 *ROW WILL BE REMOVED
2011-02-22 09:40:24 58.18 *ROW WILL BE REMOVED
2011-02-22 09:40:24 58.18 3
2011-02-22 09:40:24 58.15 1
请建议从表中选择的 sql 查询或 LINQ 表达式
目前,我可以选择查询并循环遍历所有选定的行,但在选择数百万行时需要几个小时。
我当前的代码:
string query = @"SELECT date_trans, time_trans, price
FROM tbl_data
WHERE date_trans BETWEEN '2011-02-22' AND '2011-10-21'
AND time_trans BETWEEN '09:30:00' AND '16:00:00'";
DataTable dt = oUtil.GetDataTable(query);
DataColumn col = new DataColumn("Count", typeof(int));
dt.Columns.Add(col);
int priceCount = 1;
for (int count = 0; count < dt.Rows.Count; count++)
{
double price = Convert.ToDouble(dt.Rows[count]["price"]);
double priceNext = (count == dt.Rows.Count - 1) ? 0 : Convert.ToDouble(dt.Rows[count + 1]["price"]);
if (price == priceNext)
{
priceCount++;
dt.Rows.RemoveAt(count);
count--;
}
else
{
dt.Rows[count]["Count"] = priceCount;
priceCount = 1;
}
}
最佳答案
这很有趣。我想你需要的是这样的:
SELECT MAX(date_trans), MAX(time_trans), MAX(price), COUNT(*)
FROM
(SELECT *, ROW_NUMBER() OVER(PARTITION BY price ORDER BY date_trans, time_trans) - ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY date_trans, time_trans) AS grp
FROM transactions) grps
GROUP BY grp
更新
分组列还需要包含“价格”,否则分组可能不唯一。还有一件事是日期和时间列应该合并到日期时间列中,这样最大日期时间值在接近一天结束时开始并在下一天开始时结束的组中是正确的。 这是更正后的查询。
SELECT MAX(CAST(date_trans AS DATETIME) + CAST(time_trans AS DATETIME)) , MAX(price), COUNT(*)
FROM
(SELECT *,
CAST(ROW_NUMBER() OVER(PARTITION BY price ORDER BY date_trans, time_trans) - ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY date_trans, time_trans) AS NVARCHAR(255)) + '-' + CAST(price AS NVARCHAR(255)) AS grp
FROM transactions
ORDER BY date_trans, time_trans) grps
GROUP BY grp
如果将“grp”列作为字节数组或 bigint 而不是 nvarchar,查询可能会更优化。您还提到了您可能希望在组内求和的“数量”列。
关于mysql - 优化查询或建议 LINQ 等价物,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11492582/