我有可以通过两种方式完成的代码:
SWITCH WITHOUT BREAK(用于case中的通用代码)
ResultCodes resCode = ResultCodes.fromResponseCode(resultCode);
switch (resCode) {
case SUCCESS:
if(userIdentity != null)
Logger.logInfo(MODULE, "User Authenticated Successfully, UseIdentity: " +userIdentity);
resultMessage=getText(resCode.responseCode.toString());
RESPONSE = SUCCESS;
break;
case REDIRECT:
url = resultMap.get(WebinKeyConstants.REDIRECTION_URL.val);
Logger.logInfo(MODULE, "Redirecting to URL : " + url);
resultMessage=getText(resCode.responseCode.toString());
RESPONSE = REDIRECT;
break;
case AUTHENTICATION_FAIL:
case USER_ACCOUNT_BLOCKED:
case USER_ACCOUNT_INACTIVE:
case USER_ACCOUNT_SUSPENDED:
case USER_ACCOUNT_TERMINATED:
case USER_ACCOUNT_BLOCKED_ALERT:
case OTP_SEND_SUCCESS:
case USER_PROFILE_NOT_FOUND:
resultMessage=getText(resCode.responseCode.toString());
RESPONSE = ERROR;
break;
}
在上面的场景中,只有一个中断意味着所有情况都将执行相同的代码。
WITH BREAK FOR EACH CASE(对于普通代码)
上述场景也可以通过其他方式实现,如下所示
ResultCodes resCode = ResultCodes.fromResponseCode(resultCode);
switch (resCode) {
case SUCCESS:
if(userIdentity != null)
Logger.logInfo(MODULE, "User Authenticated Successfully, UseIdentity: " +userIdentity);
resultMessage=getText(resCode.responseCode.toString());
RESPONSE = SUCCESS;
break;
case REDIRECT:
url = resultMap.get(WebinKeyConstants.REDIRECTION_URL.val);
Logger.logInfo(MODULE, "Redirecting to URL : " + url);
resultMessage=getText(resCode.responseCode.toString());
RESPONSE = REDIRECT;
break;
case AUTHENTICATION_FAIL:
resultMessage=getText(resCode.responseCode.toString());
RESPONSE = ERROR;
break;
case USER_ACCOUNT_BLOCKED:
resultMessage=getText(resCode.responseCode.toString());
RESPONSE = ERROR;
break;
case USER_ACCOUNT_INACTIVE:
resultMessage=getText(resCode.responseCode.toString());
RESPONSE = ERROR;
break;
case USER_ACCOUNT_SUSPENDED:
resultMessage=getText(resCode.responseCode.toString());
RESPONSE = ERROR;
break;
case USER_ACCOUNT_TERMINATED:
resultMessage=getText(resCode.responseCode.toString());
RESPONSE = ERROR;
break;
case USER_ACCOUNT_BLOCKED_ALERT:
resultMessage=getText(resCode.responseCode.toString());
RESPONSE = ERROR;
break;
case OTP_SEND_SUCCESS:
resultMessage=getText(resCode.responseCode.toString());
RESPONSE = ERROR;
break;
case USER_PROFILE_NOT_FOUND:
resultMessage=getText(resCode.responseCode.toString());
RESPONSE = ERROR;
break;
}
哪个更好用?有没有性能问题?
最佳答案
第一个switch block
代码更少,可读性更好。如果出现性能问题,则可以忽略不计。
关于java - 当每个 case block 都有相同的代码时,在 switch-case 语句中使用什么?,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/19581670/