html - 是否可以在不使用绝对位置的情况下进行以下布局

Question

我想避免对 HTML 进行任何更改，因为这可能会导致其他布局和设计出现倒退。因为我们在所有设计和布局中使用相同的模板。

需要在不使用.content2 绝对位置的情况下实现以下布局。并且 content2 和 content3 应该具有相同的高度。

.wrapper {
  display: flex;
}

.content {
  background: red;
}

.content2 {
  background: green;
}

.content3 {
  background: yellow;
}

.newLayout {
  position: relative;
}

.newLayout .content2 {
  position: absolute;
  right: 0;
  width: 92px;
  padding: 2px 10px;
}

.newLayout .content3 {
  white-space: nowrap;
  margin-top: 20px;
  padding: 10px;
}

<div class="wrapper newLayout">
  <div class="content">Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry. Lorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book. It
    has survived not only five centuries, but also the leap into electronic typesetting, remaining essentia</div>
  <div class="content2">Content Two</div>
  <div class="content3">Content Three</div>
</div>

Answer 1

使用 flexbox 时，您需要嵌套 flexbox 才能拥有此布局。像这样的二维布局对于 CSS grids 来说是理想的情况。 - 请参阅下面的演示:

.wrapper {
  display: grid;
  grid-template-areas: "one two" "one three";    
}

.content {
  background: red;
  grid-area: one;
}

.content2 {
  grid-area: two;
  background: green;
}

.content3 {
  grid-area: three;
  background: yellow;
}

<div class="wrapper">
  <div class="content">Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry. Lorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book. It
    has survived not only five centuries, but also the leap into electronic typesetting, remaining essentia</div>
  <div class="content2">Content Two</div>
  <div class="content3">Content Three</div>
</div>