我第一次使用biopython。如果这是一个基本问题,请原谅我。
我想输入序列,然后将它们对齐,并能够引用原始序列(无间隙)和对齐序列(有间隙)的索引位置。
我的现实世界示例是烯醇化 enzyme (Uniprot P37869 和 P0A6P9 )。底物结合赖氨酸在大肠杆菌中的索引为 392,在枯草芽孢杆菌中为 389。如果对两者进行肌肉对齐,则对齐中该赖氨酸的指数为 394。我希望能够在有间隙指数和无间隙指数之间轻松转换。
示例 1: 大肠杆菌残基 #392 的比对索引是什么? (按照对齐顺序回答 394)。
示例 2 我在 394 处的比对中发现了一个保守残基。它在原始(无缺口)序列中的哪里? (在大肠杆菌中答案为 392,在枯草芽孢杆菌中答案为 389)。
>>>cline = MuscleCommandline(input="enolase.txt", out="enolase.aln")
>>>cline()
>>> alignment = AlignIO.read("enolase.aln","fasta")
>>> print(alignment[:,390:])
SingleLetterAlphabet() alignment with 2 rows and 45 columns
AGQIKTGAPSRTDRVAKYNQLLRIEDQLAETAQYHGINSFYNLNK sp|P37869|ENO_BACSU
AGQIKTGSMSRSDRVAKYNQLIRIEEALGEKAPYNGRKEIKGQA- sp|P0A6P9|ENO_ECOLI
>>> print(alignment[:,394])
KK
最佳答案
有趣的问题!据我所知,BioPython 中没有内置的东西。这是我解决这个问题的方法。
让我们从示例 2 开始。如果您将两个文件 enolase.txt
和 enolase.aln
分别包含原始无间隙序列和 FASTA 格式的比对序列,然后我们可以循环压缩的记录,计算比对序列中的间隙数并计算未间隙序列中残基的索引:
from Bio import SeqIO, AlignIO
def find_in_original(index, original_path, alignment_path):
alignment = AlignIO.read(alignment_path, 'fasta')
original = SeqIO.parse(original_path, 'fasta')
for original_record, alignment_record in zip(original, alignment):
alignment_seq = str(alignment_record.seq)
original_seq = str(original_record.seq)
gaps = alignment_seq[:index].count('-')
original_index = len(alignment_seq[:index]) - gaps
assert alignment_seq[index] == original_seq[original_index]
yield ("The conserved residue {} at location {} in the alignment can be"
" found at location {} in {}.".format(alignment_seq[index],
index, original_index, original_record.id.split('|')[-1]))
这给出了结果:
>>> for result in find_in_original(394, 'enolase.txt', 'enolase.aln'):
... print result
The conserved residue K at location 394 in the alignment can be found at location 392 in ENO_ECOLI.
The conserved residue K at location 394 in the alignment can be found at location 389 in ENO_BACSU.
对于反向操作,我们查看比对中所有可能的索引,并在减去间隙后查看哪一个等于无间隙序列:
def find_in_alignment(index, organism, original_path, alignment_path):
alignment = AlignIO.read(alignment_path, 'fasta')
original = SeqIO.parse(original_path, 'fasta')
for original_record, alignment_record in zip(original, alignment):
if organism in original_record.id:
alignment_seq = str(alignment_record.seq)
original_seq = str(original_record.seq)
residue = original_seq[index]
for i in range(index, len(alignment_seq)):
if alignment_seq[i] == residue and \
alignment_seq[:i].replace('-', '') == original_seq[:index]:
return ("The residue {} at location {} in {} is at location"
" {} in the alignment.".format(residue, index,
organism, i))
这给出了结果:
>>> print find_in_alignment(392, 'ENO_ECOLI', 'enolase.txt', 'enolase.aln')
The residue K at location 392 in ENO_ECOLI is at location 394 in the alignment.
>>> print find_in_alignment(389, 'ENO_BACSU', ungapped_path, alignment_path)
The residue K at location 389 in ENO_BACSU is at location 394 in the alignment.
关于python - Biopython 比对的无间隙索引,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/46535260/