我正在尝试测试这种行为
-- BLOGTableAdapter.GetBlogsByTitle(字符串 title) 只被调用一次
-- 并使用具有的字符串调用 长度大于1,
-- 返回 BLOGDataTable 对象
[Test]
public void GetBlogsByBlogTitleTest4()
{
var mockAdapter = new Mock<BLOGTableAdapter>();
var mockTable = new Mock<BLOGDataTable>();
mockAdapter.Setup(x => x.GetBlogsByTitle(It.Is<string>(s => s.Length > 0))).Returns(mockTable.Object);
var blogBl = new BlogManagerBLL(mockAdapter.Object);
blogBl.GetBlogsByBlogTitle("Thanks for reading my question");
mockAdapter.VerifyAll();
mockAdapter.Verify(x => x.GetBlogsByTitle(It.Is<string>(s => s.Length > 0)), Times.Exactly(1));
}
当调用 GetBlogsByTitle(string title) 时,在类中说数据访问层中的“BlogManagerBLL”
public BLOGDataTable GetBlogsByBlogTitle(string title)
{
return Adapter.GetBlogsByTitle(title);
}
如您所见,我使用两个单独的语句来完成这些检查
mockAdapter.Setup(x => x.GetBlogsByTitle(It.Is<string>(s => s.Length > 0))).Returns(mockTable.Object);
mockAdapter.Verify(x => x.GetBlogsByTitle(It.Is<string>(s => s.Length > 0)), Times.Exactly(1));
- 我怎样才能把它合二为一 声明 ?
- 我测试的东西是否正确?
谢谢
最佳答案
如果你要测试两件事,你应该写两个测试。
[Test]
public void BlogTableAdapter_should_be_called_with_string_having_length_greater_than_1()
{
var mockAdapter = new Mock<BLOGTableAdapter>();
var blogBl = new BlogManagerBLL(mockAdapter.Object);
blogBl.GetBlogsByBlogTitle("Thanks for reading my question");
mockAdapter.Verify(x => x.GetBlogsByTitle(It.Is<string>(s => s.Length > 0)));
}
和
[Test]
public void BlogTableAdapter_should_return_a_BLOGDataTable_object()
{
var mockAdapter = new Mock<BLOGTableAdapter>();
mockAdapter.Setup(x => x.GetBlogsByTitle(It.Is<string>(s => s.Length > 0))).Returns(new BLOGDataTable());
var blogBl = new BlogManagerBLL(mockAdapter.Object);
var returnValue = blogBl.GetBlogsByBlogTitle("Thanks for reading my question");
Assert.That(returnValue, Is.TypeOf(typeof(BLOGDataTable)));
}
所以我想我的建议是不要将它们放在一起,为每个创建一个测试。我会说您正在测试正确的东西。
关于c# - 使用 Moq 和 NUnit ,什么是编写方法/更好的语法?,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2068066/