我有一组巨大的任务要在 C# 中执行。每次计算都会产生一个结果数据，我想将其写入文件(我使用的是 SQLite)。目前我正在按顺序执行此操作，例如 [Task1 -> FileSaving1]、[Task2 -> FileSaving2]。等等。
但我的首要任务是先完成所有计算，所以我想在一个线程中并行运行计算，而文件保存在另一个线程中完成。每次计算结束并准备好写入数据时，都会向 FileSaving 线程发出信号。文件保存可以是顺序的或并行的。
如何在 C# 中实现这一点？我正在使用.Net 4.0。 如果可能，请提供一些示例。
最佳答案
您可以使用 BlockingCollection<T> 来帮助解决这个问题。
棘手的事情是你想要多个线程处理工作项，但它们可以随机顺序产生输出，所以你需要在写入时多路复用输出(假设你想以与它相同的顺序写入数据如果您使用旧的单线程解决方案，就会被写入)。
I wrote a class to do this a while back .
它假定您可以将每个“工作项”封装在一个类的实例中。这些实例被添加到工作队列中；然后多个线程(通过 Task )可以从工作队列中删除工作项，处理它们，然后将它们输出到优先级队列。
最后，另一个线程可以从已完成的队列中移除已完成的工作项，注意多路复用它们，以便它以与最初添加到工作队列中的顺序相同的顺序移除这些项。
此实现为您创建和管理线程。您需要告诉它要使用多少个工作线程，并为其提供委托(delegate)以提供新的工作项 (Read())、处理每个工作项 (Process()) 并输出每个工作项 (Write())。
只有 Process()委托(delegate)被多个线程调用。
请注意，如果您不关心顺序，则可以避免所有这些内容，并且几乎可以使用 BlockingCollection直接。
代码如下:
public sealed class ParallelWorkProcessor<T> where T: class // T is the work item type.
{
public delegate T Read(); // Called by only one thread.
public delegate T Process(T block); // Called simultaneously by multiple threads.
public delegate void Write(T block); // Called by only one thread.
public ParallelWorkProcessor(Read read, Process process, Write write, int numWorkers = 0)
{
_read = read;
_process = process;
_write = write;
numWorkers = (numWorkers > 0) ? numWorkers : Environment.ProcessorCount;
_workPool = new SemaphoreSlim(numWorkers*2);
_inputQueue = new BlockingCollection<WorkItem>(numWorkers);
_outputQueue = new ConcurrentPriorityQueue<int, T>();
_workers = new Task[numWorkers];
startWorkers();
Task.Factory.StartNew(enqueueWorkItems);
_multiplexor = Task.Factory.StartNew(multiplex);
}
private void startWorkers()
{
for (int i = 0; i < _workers.Length; ++i)
{
_workers[i] = Task.Factory.StartNew(processBlocks);
}
}
private void enqueueWorkItems()
{
int index = 0;
while (true)
{
T data = _read();
if (data == null) // Signals end of input.
{
_inputQueue.CompleteAdding();
_outputQueue.Enqueue(index, null); // Special sentinel WorkItem .
break;
}
_workPool.Wait();
_inputQueue.Add(new WorkItem(data, index++));
}
}
private void multiplex()
{
int index = 0; // Next required index.
int last = int.MaxValue;
while (index != last)
{
KeyValuePair<int, T> workItem;
_outputQueue.WaitForNewItem(); // There will always be at least one item - the sentinel item.
while ((index != last) && _outputQueue.TryPeek(out workItem))
{
if (workItem.Value == null) // The sentinel item has a null value to indicate that it's the sentinel.
{
last = workItem.Key; // The sentinel's key is the index of the last block + 1.
}
else if (workItem.Key == index) // Is this block the next one that we want?
{
// Even if new items are added to the queue while we're here, the new items will be lower priority.
// Therefore it is safe to assume that the item we will dequeue now is the same one we peeked at.
_outputQueue.TryDequeue(out workItem);
Contract.Assume(workItem.Key == index); // This *must* be the case.
_workPool.Release(); // Allow the enqueuer to queue another work item.
_write(workItem.Value);
++index;
}
else // If it's not the block we want, we know we'll get a new item at some point.
{
_outputQueue.WaitForNewItem();
}
}
}
}
private void processBlocks()
{
foreach (var block in _inputQueue.GetConsumingEnumerable())
{
var processedData = _process(block.Data);
_outputQueue.Enqueue(block.Index, processedData);
}
}
public bool WaitForFinished(int maxMillisecondsToWait) // Can be Timeout.Infinite.
{
return _multiplexor.Wait(maxMillisecondsToWait);
}
private sealed class WorkItem
{
public WorkItem(T data, int index)
{
Data = data;
Index = index;
}
public T Data { get; private set; }
public int Index { get; private set; }
}
private readonly Task[] _workers;
private readonly Task _multiplexor;
private readonly SemaphoreSlim _workPool;
private readonly BlockingCollection<WorkItem> _inputQueue;
private readonly ConcurrentPriorityQueue<int, T> _outputQueue;
private readonly Read _read;
private readonly Process _process;
private readonly Write _write;
}
这是它的测试代码:
namespace Demo
{
public static class Program
{
private static void Main(string[] args)
{
_rng = new Random(34324);
int threadCount = 8;
_maxBlocks = 200;
ThreadPool.SetMinThreads(threadCount + 2, 4); // Kludge to prevent slow thread startup.
_numBlocks = _maxBlocks;
var stopwatch = Stopwatch.StartNew();
var processor = new ParallelWorkProcessor<byte[]>(read, process, write, threadCount);
processor.WaitForFinished(Timeout.Infinite);
Console.WriteLine("\n\nFinished in " + stopwatch.Elapsed + "\n\n");
}
private static byte[] read()
{
if (_numBlocks-- == 0)
{
return null;
}
var result = new byte[128];
result[0] = (byte)(_maxBlocks-_numBlocks);
Console.WriteLine("Supplied input: " + result[0]);
return result;
}
private static byte[] process(byte[] data)
{
if (data[0] == 10) // Hack for test purposes. Make it REALLY slow for this item!
{
Console.WriteLine("Delaying a call to process() for 5s for ID 10");
Thread.Sleep(5000);
}
Thread.Sleep(10 + _rng.Next(50));
Console.WriteLine("Processed: " + data[0]);
return data;
}
private static void write(byte[] data)
{
Console.WriteLine("Received output: " + data[0]);
}
private static Random _rng;
private static int _numBlocks;
private static int _maxBlocks;
}
}
这还需要一个 ConcurrentPriorityQueue implementation from here .
我不得不稍微修改一下，所以这是我修改后的版本:
using System;
using System.Collections;
using System.Collections.Concurrent;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Diagnostics;
using System.Diagnostics.CodeAnalysis;
using System.Threading;
namespace ConsoleApplication1
{
/// <summary>Provides a thread-safe priority queue data structure.</summary>
/// <typeparam name="TKey">Specifies the type of keys used to prioritize values.</typeparam>
/// <typeparam name="TValue">Specifies the type of elements in the queue.</typeparam>
[SuppressMessage("Microsoft.Naming", "CA1711:IdentifiersShouldNotHaveIncorrectSuffix")]
[SuppressMessage("Microsoft.Naming", "CA1710:IdentifiersShouldHaveCorrectSuffix")]
[DebuggerDisplay("Count={Count}")]
public sealed class ConcurrentPriorityQueue<TKey, TValue> :
IProducerConsumerCollection<KeyValuePair<TKey,TValue>>
where TKey : IComparable<TKey>
{
/// <summary>Initializes a new instance of the ConcurrentPriorityQueue class.</summary>
public ConcurrentPriorityQueue() {}
/// <summary>Initializes a new instance of the ConcurrentPriorityQueue class that contains elements copied from the specified collection.</summary>
/// <param name="collection">The collection whose elements are copied to the new ConcurrentPriorityQueue.</param>
[SuppressMessage("Microsoft.Design", "CA1006:DoNotNestGenericTypesInMemberSignatures")]
public ConcurrentPriorityQueue(IEnumerable<KeyValuePair<TKey, TValue>> collection)
{
if (collection == null) throw new ArgumentNullException("collection");
foreach (var item in collection) _minHeap.Insert(item);
}
/// <summary>Adds the key/value pair to the priority queue.</summary>
/// <param name="priority">The priority of the item to be added.</param>
/// <param name="value">The item to be added.</param>
public void Enqueue(TKey priority, TValue value)
{
Enqueue(new KeyValuePair<TKey, TValue>(priority, value));
}
/// <summary>Adds the key/value pair to the priority queue.</summary>
/// <param name="item">The key/value pair to be added to the queue.</param>
public void Enqueue(KeyValuePair<TKey, TValue> item)
{
lock (_syncLock)
{
_minHeap.Insert(item);
_newItem.Set();
}
}
/// <summary>Waits for a new item to appear.</summary>
public void WaitForNewItem()
{
_newItem.WaitOne();
}
/// <summary>Attempts to remove and return the next prioritized item in the queue.</summary>
/// <param name="result">
/// When this method returns, if the operation was successful, result contains the object removed. If
/// no object was available to be removed, the value is unspecified.
/// </param>
/// <returns>
/// true if an element was removed and returned from the queue succesfully; otherwise, false.
/// </returns>
public bool TryDequeue(out KeyValuePair<TKey, TValue> result)
{
result = default(KeyValuePair<TKey, TValue>);
lock (_syncLock)
{
if (_minHeap.Count > 0)
{
result = _minHeap.Remove();
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
/// <summary>Attempts to return the next prioritized item in the queue.</summary>
/// <param name="result">
/// When this method returns, if the operation was successful, result contains the object.
/// The queue was not modified by the operation.
/// </param>
/// <returns>
/// true if an element was returned from the queue succesfully; otherwise, false.
/// </returns>
public bool TryPeek(out KeyValuePair<TKey, TValue> result)
{
result = default(KeyValuePair<TKey, TValue>);
lock (_syncLock)
{
if (_minHeap.Count > 0)
{
result = _minHeap.Peek();
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
/// <summary>Empties the queue.</summary>
public void Clear() { lock(_syncLock) _minHeap.Clear(); }
/// <summary>Gets whether the queue is empty.</summary>
public bool IsEmpty { get { return Count == 0; } }
/// <summary>Gets the number of elements contained in the queue.</summary>
public int Count
{
get { lock (_syncLock) return _minHeap.Count; }
}
/// <summary>Copies the elements of the collection to an array, starting at a particular array index.</summary>
/// <param name="array">
/// The one-dimensional array that is the destination of the elements copied from the queue.
/// </param>
/// <param name="index">
/// The zero-based index in array at which copying begins.
/// </param>
/// <remarks>The elements will not be copied to the array in any guaranteed order.</remarks>
public void CopyTo(KeyValuePair<TKey, TValue>[] array, int index)
{
lock (_syncLock) _minHeap.Items.CopyTo(array, index);
}
/// <summary>Copies the elements stored in the queue to a new array.</summary>
/// <returns>A new array containing a snapshot of elements copied from the queue.</returns>
public KeyValuePair<TKey, TValue>[] ToArray()
{
lock (_syncLock)
{
var clonedHeap = new MinBinaryHeap(_minHeap);
var result = new KeyValuePair<TKey, TValue>[_minHeap.Count];
for (int i = 0; i < result.Length; i++)
{
result[i] = clonedHeap.Remove();
}
return result;
}
}
/// <summary>Attempts to add an item in the queue.</summary>
/// <param name="item">The key/value pair to be added.</param>
/// <returns>
/// true if the pair was added; otherwise, false.
/// </returns>
bool IProducerConsumerCollection<KeyValuePair<TKey, TValue>>.TryAdd(KeyValuePair<TKey, TValue> item)
{
Enqueue(item);
return true;
}
/// <summary>Attempts to remove and return the next prioritized item in the queue.</summary>
/// <param name="item">
/// When this method returns, if the operation was successful, result contains the object removed. If
/// no object was available to be removed, the value is unspecified.
/// </param>
/// <returns>
/// true if an element was removed and returned from the queue succesfully; otherwise, false.
/// </returns>
bool IProducerConsumerCollection<KeyValuePair<TKey, TValue>>.TryTake(out KeyValuePair<TKey, TValue> item)
{
return TryDequeue(out item);
}
/// <summary>Returns an enumerator that iterates through the collection.</summary>
/// <returns>An enumerator for the contents of the queue.</returns>
/// <remarks>
/// The enumeration represents a moment-in-time snapshot of the contents of the queue. It does not
/// reflect any updates to the collection after GetEnumerator was called. The enumerator is safe to
/// use concurrently with reads from and writes to the queue.
/// </remarks>
public IEnumerator<KeyValuePair<TKey, TValue>> GetEnumerator()
{
var arr = ToArray();
return ((IEnumerable<KeyValuePair<TKey, TValue>>)arr).GetEnumerator();
}
/// <summary>Returns an enumerator that iterates through a collection.</summary>
/// <returns>An IEnumerator that can be used to iterate through the collection.</returns>
IEnumerator IEnumerable.GetEnumerator() { return GetEnumerator(); }
/// <summary>Copies the elements of the collection to an array, starting at a particular array index.</summary>
/// <param name="array">
/// The one-dimensional array that is the destination of the elements copied from the queue.
/// </param>
/// <param name="index">
/// The zero-based index in array at which copying begins.
/// </param>
void ICollection.CopyTo(Array array, int index)
{
lock (_syncLock) ((ICollection)_minHeap.Items).CopyTo(array, index);
}
/// <summary>
/// Gets a value indicating whether access to the ICollection is synchronized with the SyncRoot.
/// </summary>
bool ICollection.IsSynchronized { get { return true; } }
/// <summary>
/// Gets an object that can be used to synchronize access to the collection.
/// </summary>
object ICollection.SyncRoot { get { return _syncLock; } }
/// <summary>Implements a binary heap that prioritizes smaller values.</summary>
private sealed class MinBinaryHeap
{
private readonly List<KeyValuePair<TKey, TValue>> _items;
/// <summary>Initializes an empty heap.</summary>
public MinBinaryHeap()
{
_items = new List<KeyValuePair<TKey, TValue>>();
}
/// <summary>Initializes a heap as a copy of another heap instance.</summary>
/// <param name="heapToCopy">The heap to copy.</param>
/// <remarks>Key/Value values are not deep cloned.</remarks>
public MinBinaryHeap(MinBinaryHeap heapToCopy)
{
_items = new List<KeyValuePair<TKey, TValue>>(heapToCopy.Items);
}
/// <summary>Empties the heap.</summary>
public void Clear() { _items.Clear(); }
/// <summary>Adds an item to the heap.</summary>
public void Insert(KeyValuePair<TKey,TValue> entry)
{
// Add the item to the list, making sure to keep track of where it was added.
_items.Add(entry);
int pos = _items.Count - 1;
// If the new item is the only item, we're done.
if (pos == 0) return;
// Otherwise, perform log(n) operations, walking up the tree, swapping
// where necessary based on key values
while (pos > 0)
{
// Get the next position to check
int nextPos = (pos-1) / 2;
// Extract the entry at the next position
var toCheck = _items[nextPos];
// Compare that entry to our new one. If our entry has a smaller key, move it up.
// Otherwise, we're done.
if (entry.Key.CompareTo(toCheck.Key) < 0)
{
_items[pos] = toCheck;
pos = nextPos;
}
else break;
}
// Make sure we put this entry back in, just in case
_items[pos] = entry;
}
/// <summary>Returns the entry at the top of the heap.</summary>
public KeyValuePair<TKey, TValue> Peek()
{
// Returns the first item
if (_items.Count == 0) throw new InvalidOperationException("The heap is empty.");
return _items[0];
}
/// <summary>Removes the entry at the top of the heap.</summary>
public KeyValuePair<TKey, TValue> Remove()
{
// Get the first item and save it for later (this is what will be returned).
if (_items.Count == 0) throw new InvalidOperationException("The heap is empty.");
KeyValuePair<TKey, TValue> toReturn = _items[0];
// Remove the first item if there will only be 0 or 1 items left after doing so.
if (_items.Count <= 2) _items.RemoveAt(0);
// A reheapify will be required for the removal
else
{
// Remove the first item and move the last item to the front.
_items[0] = _items[_items.Count - 1];
_items.RemoveAt(_items.Count - 1);
// Start reheapify
int current = 0, possibleSwap = 0;
// Keep going until the tree is a heap
while (true)
{
// Get the positions of the node's children
int leftChildPos = 2 * current + 1;
int rightChildPos = leftChildPos + 1;
// Should we swap with the left child?
if (leftChildPos < _items.Count)
{
// Get the two entries to compare (node and its left child)
var entry1 = _items[current];
var entry2 = _items[leftChildPos];
// If the child has a lower key than the parent, set that as a possible swap
if (entry2.Key.CompareTo(entry1.Key) < 0) possibleSwap = leftChildPos;
}
else break; // if can't swap this, we're done
// Should we swap with the right child? Note that now we check with the possible swap
// position (which might be current and might be left child).
if (rightChildPos < _items.Count)
{
// Get the two entries to compare (node and its left child)
var entry1 = _items[possibleSwap];
var entry2 = _items[rightChildPos];
// If the child has a lower key than the parent, set that as a possible swap
if (entry2.Key.CompareTo(entry1.Key) < 0) possibleSwap = rightChildPos;
}
// Now swap current and possible swap if necessary
if (current != possibleSwap)
{
var temp = _items[current];
_items[current] = _items[possibleSwap];
_items[possibleSwap] = temp;
}
else break; // if nothing to swap, we're done
// Update current to the location of the swap
current = possibleSwap;
}
}
// Return the item from the heap
return toReturn;
}
/// <summary>Gets the number of objects stored in the heap.</summary>
public int Count { get { return _items.Count; } }
internal List<KeyValuePair<TKey, TValue>> Items { get { return _items; } }
}
private readonly AutoResetEvent _newItem = new AutoResetEvent(false);
private readonly object _syncLock = new object();
private readonly MinBinaryHeap _minHeap = new MinBinaryHeap();
}
}
关于c# - 如何在多线程中并行运行依赖任务？，我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/16209179/