我刚刚读了this article并认为如果 Runnable
抛出异常并退出,线程池可能会用完工作线程。我做了一个小代码并进行了检查,但池大小没有变化。
public class ThreadPoolTest {
public static void main(String[] args) throws InterruptedException {
ThreadPoolExecutor tp = new ThreadPoolExecutor(1, 1, 5, TimeUnit.SECONDS, new ArrayBlockingQueue<Runnable>(1));
Thread.sleep(1000);
System.out.println(tp.getPoolSize());
tp.execute(new Runnable(){
@Override
public void run() {
System.out.println("Executing & Throwing");
throw new NullPointerException();
}
});
Thread.sleep(1000);
System.out.println(tp.getPoolSize());
tp.execute(new Runnable(){
@Override
public void run() {
System.out.println("Executing & Throwing");
throw new NullPointerException();
}
});
Thread.sleep(1000);
System.out.println(tp.getPoolSize());
tp.shutdown();
}
我得到的输出是
0
Exception in thread "pool-1-thread-1" java.lang.NullPointerException
at threads.ThreadPoolTest$1.run(ThreadPoolTest.java:18)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(Unknown Source)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
Executing & Throwing
1
Exception in thread "pool-1-thread-2" java.lang.NullPointerException
at threads.ThreadPoolTest$2.run(ThreadPoolTest.java:29)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(Unknown Source)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
Executing & Throwing
1
这是在 Java 7 上。是否有文章中所述的易受攻击的 java 线程池实现?
最佳答案
阅读这篇文章,要点是写得不好的线程池可能会遇到这个问题。事实上,任何创建线程并且不/不能处理来自该线程的未捕获异常的应用程序。
我希望任何信誉良好的线程池来源都能以某种方式处理这种情况。通过信誉,我会包括 Oracle 来源的解决方案。我怀疑如果有人手工编写线程池代码并且他们缺乏经验,那么他们会编写一个不太健壮的解决方案。
关于java - 线程抛出 RuntimeException - 对线程池的影响,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/15429227/