c++ - 宏没有用直接调用展开,而是用间接调用展开

标签 c++ macros variadic-macros boost-preprocessor

我有以下宏

#include <boost/preprocessor.hpp>

#define DB_FIELD(...) BOOST_PP_VARIADIC_TO_SEQ(__VA_ARGS__)

#define DB_TOFIELD(type,name) \
  private:\
  type name##_;\
  public:\
  const type& get_##name(){return name##_;}\
  void set_##name(const type& val) { name##_ = val; }

#define GEN_ENUM_FIELD(r,data,elem) BOOST_PP_CAT(FIELD_,BOOST_PP_SEQ_ELEM(1,elem)),

#define DECLARE(type, name) DB_TOFIELD(type, name)

#define GEN_FIELD_DECL(r, data, elem) DECLARE(BOOST_PP_SEQ_ELEM(0,elem),BOOST_PP_SEQ_ELEM(1,elem))

#define DB_TABLE(name, ...) class name : public DataBaseTable {\
  public:\
  constexpr static const char *get_table_name() { return #name; }\
  BOOST_PP_LIST_FOR_EACH(GEN_FIELD_DECL,, BOOST_PP_VARIADIC_TO_LIST(__VA_ARGS__)) \
  enum Fields{ \
  BOOST_PP_LIST_FOR_EACH(GEN_ENUM_FIELD,, BOOST_PP_VARIADIC_TO_LIST(__VA_ARGS__))\
  FIELD_COUNT\
  };\
  };

现在是下面的代码:

DB_TABLE(Test2,
  DB_FIELD(int, foo),
  DB_FIELD(int, bar)
)

生成:

class Test2 : public DataBaseTable {
public:
  constexpr static const char *get_table_name() { return "Test2"; }
private:
  int foo_;
public:
  const int &get_foo() { return foo_; }
  void set_foo(const int &val) { foo_ = val; }
private:
  int bar_;
public:
  const int &get_bar() { return bar_; }
  void set_bar(const int &val) { bar_ = val; }
  enum Fields { FIELD_foo, FIELD_bar, FIELD_COUNT };
};

这和我写的一样丑陋,但我担心的是为什么我需要在 GEN_FIELD_DECL 宏中使用这种间接级别(DECLARE)?直接调用 DB_TOFIELD

#define GEN_FIELD_DECL(r, data, elem) DB_TOFIELD(BOOST_PP_SEQ_ELEM(0,elem),BOOST_PP_SEQ_ELEM(1,elem))

产生垃圾:

class Test2 : public DataBaseTable {
public:
  constexpr static const char *get_table_name() { return "Test2"; }
private:
  int foo _;
public:
  const int &get_BOOST_PP_SEQ_ELEM(1, (int)(foo))() { return foo _; }
  void set_BOOST_PP_SEQ_ELEM(1, (int)(foo))(const int &val) { foo _ = val; }
private:
  int bar _;
public:
  const int &get_BOOST_PP_SEQ_ELEM(1, (int)(bar))() { return bar _; }
  void set_BOOST_PP_SEQ_ELEM(1, (int)(bar))(const int &val) { bar _ = val; }
  enum Fields { FIELD_foo, FIELD_bar, FIELD_COUNT };
};

clang 3.7.1 和 gcc 5.3 重现了相同的行为

最佳答案

如果参数是 ### 运算符的参数,您遇到的是预处理器如何扩展参数的异常。来自 C++.2011 §16.3.1¶1:

After the arguments for the invocation of a function-like macro have been identified, argument substitution takes place. A parameter in the replacement list, unless preceded by a # or ## preprocessing token or followed by a ## preprocessing token (see below), is replaced by the corresponding argument after all macros contained therein have been expanded. Before being substituted, each argument’s preprocessing tokens are completely macro replaced as if they formed the rest of the preprocessing file; no other preprocessing tokens are available.

宏间接避免了异常子句,导致参数在被其他宏处理之前展开。

例如:

#define FOO 10
#define BAR(x) x ## 7
#define BAR2(x) BAR(x)

int x = BAR(FOO);      // => int x = FOO7;

int y = BAR2(FOO);     // => int y = BAR(10); (intermediate result)
                       // => int y = 107;     (final expansion)

关于c++ - 宏没有用直接调用展开,而是用间接调用展开,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/35710536/

相关文章:

c++ - 如何在 C++ 中实现以逗号分隔的初始化,例如 Eigen 中的初始化?

c++ - 在 QT C++ 中为行或列添加右键单击并添加复制选项

c++ - 二叉搜索树分析

c++ - Variadac 宏将宏应用于所有参数

c - 可变参数宏不起作用

c++ - 比较 boost::any 内容

c - x86 程序集 : Using #define'd constants as arguments in calls to to #define's macros

c++ - 在没有宏的情况下获取编译时日期和时间

macros - 如何创建 nnkUInt16Lit NimNode

c++ - ISO C++ 的带有零参数的可变参数宏