我正在使用外部存储将等待发送到服务器的事件存储在数据库中。
我发现插入记录时性能很差。 我知道外部存储器可能很慢,但我想查看一些数字,所以我编写了一个小应用程序来测试它。
代码如下:
public static final int INSERTS = 100;
File dbFile = new File(Environment.getExternalStorageDirectory(), "test.sqlite3");
// File dbFile = new File(getFilesDir(), "test.sqlite3");
dbFile.delete();
SQLiteDatabase db = SQLiteDatabase.openOrCreateDatabase(dbFile, null);
db.execSQL("CREATE TABLE events (_id integer primary key autoincrement, event_type TEXT NOT NULL, timestamp BIGINT, data TEXT);");
db.execSQL("CREATE INDEX mainIndex ON events (event_type, timestamp ASC);");
InsertHelper helper = new InsertHelper(db, "events");
final int eventTypeCol = helper.getColumnIndex("event_type");
final int timestampCol = helper.getColumnIndex("timestamp");
final int dataCol = helper.getColumnIndex("data");
long start = System.currentTimeMillis();
String eventType = "foo", data = "bar";
long timestamp = 4711;
for(int i = 0; i < INSERTS; ++i) {
helper.prepareForInsert();
helper.bind(eventTypeCol, eventType);
helper.bind(timestampCol, timestamp);
helper.bind(dataCol, data);
helper.execute();
}
long end = System.currentTimeMillis();
Log.i("Test", String.format("InsertHelper, Speed: %d ms, Records per second: %.2f", (int)(end-start), 1000*(double)INSERTS/(double)(end-start)));
db.close();
dbFile.delete();
db = SQLiteDatabase.openOrCreateDatabase(dbFile, null);
db.execSQL("CREATE TABLE events (_id integer primary key autoincrement, event_type TEXT NOT NULL, timestamp BIGINT, data TEXT);");
db.execSQL("CREATE INDEX mainIndex ON events (event_type, timestamp ASC);");
start = System.currentTimeMillis();
ContentValues cv = new ContentValues();
for(int i = 0; i < INSERTS; ++i) {
cv.put("event_type", eventType);
cv.put("timestamp", timestamp);
cv.put("data", data);
db.insert("events", null, cv);
}
end = System.currentTimeMillis();
Log.i("Test", String.format("Normal, Speed: %d ms, Records per second: %.2f", end-start, 1000*(double)INSERTS/(double)(end-start)));
db.close();
dbFile.delete();
数据库与我的真实应用程序使用的数据库完全一样,我尝试删除索引但没有任何区别。
结果如下:
Nexus One, Internal memory Method | Records | Time (ms) | Records per second -------------+---------+-----------+-------------------- Normal | 100 | 2072 | 48.26 InsertHelper | 100 | 1662 | 60.17 Nexus One, External memory: Method | Records | Time (ms) | Records per second -------------+---------+-----------+-------------------- Normal | 100 | 7390 | 13.53 InsertHelper | 100 | 7152 | 13.98 Emulator, Internal memory: Method | Records | Time (ms) | Records per second -------------+---------+-----------+-------------------- Normal | 100 | 1803 | 55.46 InsertHelper | 100 | 3075 | 32.52 Emulator, External memory: Method | Records | Time (ms) | Records per second -------------+---------+-----------+-------------------- Normal | 100 | 5742 | 17.42 InsertHelper | 100 | 7164 | 13.96
如您所见,模拟器不可信任,InsertHelper
如果有的话,应该会更快。
当然,这是意料之中的,测试主要是出于好奇。
然而,我担心的是使用外部存储器时手机性能不佳,我是否错过了 SQLiteDatabase
的一些关键方面?还是仅仅是为了让 SD 卡变慢?
我可以在我禁用的真实应用中添加 locking这没什么区别。
最佳答案
CommonsWare 的评论是正确的。对数据库性能产生重大影响的是使用事务。将您的插入循环包装在事务中。我不是 100% 确定它是否适用于 InsertHelper 但你可以尝试用这个替换你的 for 循环:
db.beginTransaction();
try {
for(int i = 0; i < INSERTS; ++i) {
helper.prepareForInsert();
helper.bind(eventTypeCol, eventType);
helper.bind(timestampCol, timestamp);
helper.bind(dataCol, data);
helper.execute();
}
db.setTransactionSuccessful();
} finally {
db.endTransaction();
}
关于android - Android 中外部存储的 SQLite 性能不佳,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6351808/