我想写一个简单的 C 程序来更好地理解信号量。有两个线程,它们都调用同一个函数。第一个,增加全局变量,第二个线程,减少全局变量。
我试图在第一个线程完成其工作之前阻止第二个线程使用该函数。但我仍然得到错误的答案:-2000。看起来两个线程都有偏移量 -1。我该如何解决这个问题,使输出始终为 0?我认为函数内部的 sem_wait 应该阻塞第二个线程,直到第一个线程结束。因此偏移量应该保持为 1。
#include <stdio.h>
#include <pthread.h>
#include <semaphore.h>
#define NUM_LOOPS 1000
long long counter = 0;
sem_t sem;
sem_t sem1;
void* counting_thread(void* arg) {
sem_wait(&sem);
int offset = *(int*) arg;
int i;
for(i = 0; i < NUM_LOOPS; i++){
//sem_wait(&sem);
counter += offset;
printf("offset = %d\n", offset1);
//sem_post(&sem);
}
sem_post(&sem);
pthread_exit(NULL);
}
int main() {
sem_init(&sem, 0, 1);
pthread_t th1;
int offset = 1;
pthread_create(&th1, NULL, &counting_thread, &offset);
//sem_post(&sem1);
pthread_t th2;
offset = -1;
pthread_create(&th2, NULL, &counting_thread, &offset);
pthread_join(th1, NULL);
pthread_join(th2, NULL);
printf("Finnal counter value: %lld\n", counter);
sem_destroy(&sem);
return 0;
}
最佳答案
Notes See pthread_self(3) for further information on the thread ID returned in *thread by pthread_create(). Unless real-time scheduling policies are being employed, after a call to pthread_create(), it is indeterminate which thread-the caller or the new thread-will next execute.
不能保证下一个执行的是谁。
也许对你来说 main
线程接下来正在执行并在新线程之前将 offset 设置为 -1
,使其从 offset
读取更新的值,这是-1
。
您可以使用条件变量来同步。
例如:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <pthread.h>
#include <semaphore.h>
#define NUM_LOOPS 1000
long long counter = 0;
sem_t sem;
sem_t sem1;
pthread_cond_t cond1 = PTHREAD_COND_INITIALIZER;
pthread_mutex_t lock = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
void* counting_thread(void* arg) {
sem_wait(&sem);
int offset = *(int*) arg;
pthread_cond_signal(&cond1);
int i;
for(i = 0; i < NUM_LOOPS; i++){
counter += offset;
printf("offset = %d\n", offset);
}
sem_post(&sem);
pthread_exit(NULL);
}
int main() {
sem_init(&sem, 0, 1);
int offset = 1;
pthread_t th1;
pthread_create(&th1, NULL, &counting_thread, &offset);
pthread_cond_wait(&cond1, &lock);
pthread_t th2;
offset = -1;
pthread_create(&th2, NULL, &counting_thread, &offset);
pthread_join(th1, NULL);
pthread_join(th2, NULL);
printf("Finnal counter value: %lld\n", counter);
sem_destroy(&sem);
return 0;
}
关于c - 为什么信号量不阻塞第二个线程? (C),我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/58687884/