读完这个问题后,我真的不喜欢这个答案。
Rails / RSpec: How to test #initialize method?
也许我遇到了第三种情况。这就是我现在所拥有的,受到该答案中第二个代码的启发。
# Picture is collection of SinglePictures with same name and filename,
# but different dimensions
class Picture
attr_accessor :name, :filename
attr_reader :single_pics, :largest_width
def initialize(name, filename, dimensions=nil)
@largest_width = 0
@single_pics = {}
add_single_pics(dimensions) if dimensions
end
def add_single_pics(max_dimension)
# logic
end
end
describe '#initialize' do
it 'should not call add_single_pics if dimensions is not given' do
subject = Picture.new('Test Picture', 'Test-Picture')
expect(subject.largest_width).to eq 0
end
it 'should call add_single_pics if dimensions are given' do
subject = Picture.new('Test Picture', 'Test-Picture', 1920)
expect(subject.largest_width).to eq 1920
end
end
我真的不喜欢这个,因为我正在 #initialize 测试中测试 add_single_pics 的功能。我想在规范中以某种方式写下这个:
expect(subject).not_to have_received(:add_single_pics)
expect(subject).to have_received(:add_single_pics)
但我明白了
Expected to have received add_single_pics, but that object is not a spy
or method has not been stubbed.
我能以某种方式解决这个问题吗?
最佳答案
Spies are an alternate type of test double that support this pattern by allowing you to expect that a message has been received after the fact, using have_received.
https://relishapp.com/rspec/rspec-mocks/v/3-5/docs/basics/spies
只有 spy 对象可以存储方法调用。要按照您想要的方式测试您的真实类,您必须在初始化类之前使用 expect_any_instance_of
语句:
expect_any_instance_of(Picture).to receive(:add_single_pics)
Picture.new('Test Picture', 'Test-Picture')
在这种情况下,您的 add_single_pics
方法将被调用,但其逻辑不会运行,如果您需要运行它,您需要调用 and_call_original
方法匹配器:
expect_any_instance_of(Picture).to receive(:add_single_pics).and_call_original
关于ruby - RSpec - 如何测试对象是否在 #initialize 中向自身发送消息,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/40025889/