java - 提升 PostgreSQL 查询性能 left join 1 亿条数据

标签 java hibernate postgresql

我正在使用 Postgresql-9.2 版本Windows 7 64 位RAM 6GB。这是一个 Java 企业项目。

我必须在我的页面中显示订单相关信息。通过左连接将三个表放在一起。

表格:

  1. TV_HD(389772 行)
  2. TV_SNAPSHOT(1564756 行)
  3. TD_MAKKA(419298 行)

左连接 3 个表后,查询给出 487252。也会一天比一天增加。

enter image description here

表关系:

  1. TV_HD 包含与 TV_SNAPSHOT 的“一对多”关系
  2. TV_HD 包含与 TD_MAKKA 的“一对多”关系

为了更好地理解,我现在给出一个带有 sql 查询的图形 View

SELECT * FROM tv_hd where urino = 1630799 enter image description here

SELECT * FROM tv_snapshot where urino = 1630799 enter image description here

SELECT * FROM td_makka where urino = 1630799 enter image description here 此查询运行大约 90 秒。如何提高查询性能?

我也考虑过索引。但据我所知,当我们想从表中获取 2%-4% 的数据时,实际上会使用索引。`但就我而言,我需要这 3 个表中的所有数据。

这里是查询:

SELECT count(*)
FROM (SELECT HD.URINO
      FROM
        TV_HD HD
        LEFT JOIN TV_SNAPSHOT T ON (HD.URINO = T.URINO AND HD.TCODE = T.TCODE AND T.DELFLG = 0 AND T.SYUBETSU = 1)
        LEFT JOIN TV_SNAPSHOT T_SQ
          ON (HD.URINO = T_SQ.URINO AND HD.SQCODE = T_SQ.TCODE AND T_SQ.DELFLG = 0 AND T_SQ.SYUBETSU = 3)
        LEFT JOIN (SELECT N.URINO
                   FROM
                     TD_MAKKA N
                   WHERE
                     N.UPDATETIME IN (
                       SELECT MIN(NMIN.UPDATETIME)
                       FROM
                         TD_MAKKA NMIN
                       WHERE
                         N.URINO = NMIN.URINO
                         AND
                         NMIN.TORIKESHIFLG <> -1
                     )
                  ) NYUMIN
          ON (HD.URINO = NYUMIN.URINO)
        LEFT JOIN
        (
          SELECT
            NSUM.URINO,
            SUM(COALESCE(NSUM.NYUKIN, 0))                                                             NYUKIN,
            SUM(COALESCE(NSUM.NYUKIN, 0)) + SUM(COALESCE(NSUM.TESU, 0)) + SUM(COALESCE(NSUM.SOTA, 0)) SUMNYUKIN
          FROM
            TD_MAKKA NSUM
          GROUP BY
            URINO
        ) NYUSUM
          ON (HD.URINO = NYUSUM.URINO)
        LEFT JOIN
        (
          SELECT N.URINO
          FROM
            TD_MAKKA N
          WHERE
            UPDATETIME = (
              SELECT MAX(UPDATETIME)
              FROM
                TD_MAKKA NMAX
              WHERE
                N.URINO = NMAX.URINO
                AND
                NMAX.TORIKESHIFLG <> -1
            )
        ) NYUMAX
          ON (HD.URINO = NYUMAX.URINO)
      WHERE ((HD.URIBRUI <> '1') OR (HD.URIBRUI = '1' AND T_SQ.NYUKOBEFLG = '-1'))
      ORDER BY
        HD.URINO DESC
     ) COUNT_

这是EXPLAIN ANALYZE的结果

Aggregate  (cost=7246861.21..7246861.22 rows=1 width=0) (actual time=69549.159..69549.159 rows=1 loops=1)
  ->  Merge Left Join  (cost=7240188.92..7242117.36 rows=379508 width=6) (actual time=68602.689..69510.563 rows=487252 loops=1)
        Merge Cond: (hd.urino = n.urino)
        ->  Sort  (cost=3727299.33..3728248.10 rows=379508 width=6) (actual time=62160.072..62557.132 rows=420036 loops=1)
              Sort Key: hd.urino
              Sort Method: external merge  Disk: 6984kB
              ->  Hash Right Join  (cost=169264.26..3686940.26 rows=379508 width=6) (actual time=54796.930..60172.248 rows=420036 loops=1)
                    Hash Cond: (n.urino = hd.urino)
                    ->  Seq Scan on td_makka n  (cost=0.00..3511201.36 rows=209673 width=6) (actual time=24.326..4640.020 rows=419143 loops=1)
                          Filter: (SubPlan 1)
                          Rows Removed by Filter: 155
                          SubPlan 1
                            ->  Aggregate  (cost=8.33..8.34 rows=1 width=23) (actual time=0.009..0.009 rows=1 loops=419298)
                                  ->  Index Scan using idx_td_makka on td_makka nmin  (cost=0.00..8.33 rows=1 width=23) (actual time=0.006..0.007 rows=1 loops=419298)
                                        Index Cond: (n.urino = urino)
                                        Filter: (torikeshiflg <> (-1)::numeric)
                                        Rows Removed by Filter: 0
                    ->  Hash  (cost=163037.41..163037.41 rows=379508 width=6) (actual time=54771.078..54771.078 rows=386428 loops=1)
                          Buckets: 4096  Batches: 16  Memory Usage: 737kB
                          ->  Hash Right Join  (cost=75799.55..163037.41 rows=379508 width=6) (actual time=51599.167..54605.901 rows=386428 loops=1)
                                Hash Cond: ((t_sq.urino = hd.urino) AND (t_sq.tcode = hd.sqcode))
                                Filter: ((hd.uribrui <> '1'::bpchar) OR ((hd.uribrui = '1'::bpchar) AND (t_sq.nyukobeflg = (-1)::numeric)))
                                Rows Removed by Filter: 3344
                                ->  Seq Scan on tv_snapshot t_sq  (cost=0.00..73705.42 rows=385577 width=15) (actual time=0.053..2002.953 rows=389983 loops=1)
                                      Filter: ((delflg = 0::numeric) AND (syubetsu = 3::numeric))
                                      Rows Removed by Filter: 1174773
                                ->  Hash  (cost=68048.99..68048.99 rows=389771 width=14) (actual time=51596.055..51596.055 rows=389772 loops=1)
                                      Buckets: 4096  Batches: 16  Memory Usage: 960kB
                                      ->  Hash Right Join  (cost=21125.85..68048.99 rows=389771 width=14) (actual time=579.405..51348.270 rows=389772 loops=1)
                                            Hash Cond: (nyusum.urino = hd.urino)
                                            ->  Subquery Scan on nyusum  (cost=0.00..35839.52 rows=365638 width=6) (actual time=17.435..49996.674 rows=385537 loops=1)
                                                  ->  GroupAggregate  (cost=0.00..32183.14 rows=365638 width=34) (actual time=17.430..49871.702 rows=385537 loops=1)
                                                        ->  Index Scan using idx_td_makka on td_makka nsum  (cost=0.00..21456.76 rows=419345 width=34) (actual time=0.017..48357.702 rows=419298 loops=1)
                                            ->  Hash  (cost=13969.71..13969.71 rows=389771 width=20) (actual time=491.549..491.549 rows=389772 loops=1)
                                                  Buckets: 4096  Batches: 32  Memory Usage: 567kB
                                                  ->  Seq Scan on tv_hd hd  (cost=0.00..13969.71 rows=389771 width=20) (actual time=0.052..242.415 rows=389772 loops=1)
        ->  Sort  (cost=3512889.60..3512894.84 rows=2097 width=6) (actual time=6442.600..6541.728 rows=486359 loops=1)
              Sort Key: n.urino
              Sort Method: external sort  Disk: 8600kB
              ->  Seq Scan on td_makka n  (cost=0.00..3512773.90 rows=2097 width=6) (actual time=0.135..4053.116 rows=419143 loops=1)
                    Filter: ((updatetime)::text = (SubPlan 2))
                    Rows Removed by Filter: 155
                    SubPlan 2
                      ->  Aggregate  (cost=8.33..8.34 rows=1 width=23) (actual time=0.008..0.008 rows=1 loops=419298)
                            ->  Index Scan using idx_td_makka on td_makka nmax  (cost=0.00..8.33 rows=1 width=23) (actual time=0.005..0.006 rows=1 loops=419298)
                                  Index Cond: (n.urino = urino)
                                  Filter: (torikeshiflg <> (-1)::numeric)
                                  Rows Removed by Filter: 0
Total runtime: 69575.139 ms

这里是解释分析结果的详细信息:

http://explain.depesz.com/s/23Fg

最佳答案

第一步: 您可以删除选择查询中不需要的更多列,因为您只需要计算总行数。例如:

select count(*) from ( SELECT
    HD.URINO
FROM
    TV_HD HD
    LEFT JOIN TV_SNAPSHOT T ON (HD.URINO = T.URINO AND HD.TCODE = T.TCODE AND T.DELFLG = 0 AND T.SYUBETSU = 1)
    LEFT JOIN TV_SNAPSHOT T_SQ ON (HD.URINO = T_SQ.URINO AND HD.SQCODE = T_SQ.TCODE AND T_SQ.DELFLG = 0 AND T_SQ.SYUBETSU = 3)
    LEFT JOIN (SELECT
                    N.URINO
            FROM
                TD_MAKKA N
            WHERE
                N.UPDATETIME IN (
                    SELECT
                        MIN (NMIN.UPDATETIME)
                    FROM
                        TD_MAKKA NMIN
                    WHERE
                        N.URINO = NMIN.URINO
                    AND
                        NMIN.TORIKESHIFLG <> -1 
                )
        ) NYUMIN
    ON  (HD.URINO = NYUMIN.URINO) 
            LEFT JOIN
                (
                    SELECT
                        NSUM.URINO
                        ,SUM (COALESCE(NSUM.NYUKIN ,0)) NYUKIN
                        ,SUM (COALESCE(NSUM.NYUKIN ,0)) + SUM (COALESCE(NSUM.TESU ,0)) + SUM (COALESCE(NSUM.SOTA ,0)) SUMNYUKIN
                    FROM
                        TD_MAKKA NSUM
                    GROUP BY
                        URINO
                ) NYUSUM
            ON  (HD.URINO = NYUSUM.URINO)
            LEFT JOIN
                (
                    SELECT
                         N.URINO
                    FROM
                        TD_MAKKA N
                    WHERE
                        UPDATETIME = (
                            SELECT
                                MAX (UPDATETIME)
                            FROM
                                TD_MAKKA NMAX
                            WHERE
                                N.URINO = NMAX.URINO
                            AND
                                NMAX.TORIKESHIFLG <> -1 
                        )
               ) NYUMAX
            ON  (HD.URINO = NYUMAX.URINO)
WHERE ( (HD.URIBRUI <> '1') OR ( HD.URIBRUI = '1' AND T_SQ.NYUKOBEFLG = '-1' ) )
 ORDER BY 
 HD.URINO DESC
  ) COUNT_

第二步: 您可以避免左连接,这对获取行数没有意义。 例如:

select count(*) from ( SELECT
    HD.URINO
FROM
    TV_HD HD
    LEFT JOIN TV_SNAPSHOT T ON (HD.URINO = T.URINO AND HD.TCODE = T.TCODE AND T.DELFLG = 0 AND T.SYUBETSU = 1)
    LEFT JOIN TV_SNAPSHOT T_SQ ON (HD.URINO = T_SQ.URINO AND HD.SQCODE = T_SQ.TCODE AND T_SQ.DELFLG = 0 AND T_SQ.SYUBETSU = 3)
    LEFT JOIN (SELECT
                    N.URINO
            FROM
                TD_MAKKA N
            WHERE
                N.UPDATETIME IN (
                    SELECT
                        MIN (NMIN.UPDATETIME)
                    FROM
                        TD_MAKKA NMIN
                    WHERE
                        N.URINO = NMIN.URINO
                    AND
                        NMIN.TORIKESHIFLG <> -1 
                )
        ) NYUMIN
    ON  (HD.URINO = NYUMIN.URINO) 
            LEFT JOIN
                (
                    SELECT
                         N.URINO
                    FROM
                        TD_MAKKA N
                    WHERE
                        UPDATETIME = (
                            SELECT
                                MAX (UPDATETIME)
                            FROM
                                TD_MAKKA NMAX
                            WHERE
                                N.URINO = NMAX.URINO
                            AND
                                NMAX.TORIKESHIFLG <> -1 
                        )
               ) NYUMAX
            ON  (HD.URINO = NYUMAX.URINO)
WHERE ( (HD.URIBRUI <> '1') OR ( HD.URIBRUI = '1' AND T_SQ.NYUKOBEFLG = '-1' ) )

  ) COUNT_

第三步:您可以使用PgAdmin Graphical Explain Plans 来分析查询并避免其他不必要的执行开销。

关于java - 提升 PostgreSQL 查询性能 left join 1 亿条数据,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/35438400/

相关文章:

spring.jpa.properties.javax.persistence.query.timeout 不适用于 PostgreSQL

java - 用于(moa PairedLearners)的示例代码

java - Simple Injector 中是否有相当于 Guice Providers 的东西?

java - 如何通过循环将字符串添加到字符串数组列表

java - 两天之间的 hibernate 标准

mysql - @UniqueConstraint 可空字段

postgresql - Sequelize 关系 "likes"不存在

java - 如何从 .jar 文件中访问与 .jar 文件位于同一文件夹中的 .dat 文件?

java - 在 Hibernate 中使用 Map 和 @ElementCollection 时指定外键约束名称

postgresql - 找不到wal备份文件