我读了:
How to avoid memory leak with shared_ptr?
我知道我需要使用weak_ptr 来避免循环引用。
所以我创建了一个小程序来播放循环引用。
以下对象(spyder)将被调用
class spyder {
public:
spyder(std::string _name):
m_name(_name), finger(nullptr)
{ }
inline const std::string ask_name() const{
return m_name;
}
std::shared_ptr<spyder> finger;
private:
std::string m_name;
};
我在主代码中使用 shared_ptr 和 weak_ptr 调用 spyder:
int main(){
auto sA = std::make_shared<spyder>("A");
auto sB = std::make_shared<spyder>("B");
std::weak_ptr<spyder> wp_sA(sA);
std::weak_ptr<spyder> wp_sB(sB);
sA->finger = wp_sB.lock();
sB->finger = wp_sA.lock();
}
以上代码发生了内存泄漏(使用valgrind检查)
==20753== Memcheck, a memory error detector
==20753== Copyright (C) 2002-2017, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==20753== Using Valgrind-3.14.0 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info
==20753== Command: ./t
==20753==
==20753==
==20753== HEAP SUMMARY:
==20753== in use at exit: 128 bytes in 2 blocks
==20753== total heap usage: 3 allocs, 1 frees, 72,832 bytes allocated
==20753==
==20753== LEAK SUMMARY:
==20753== definitely lost: 64 bytes in 1 blocks
==20753== indirectly lost: 64 bytes in 1 blocks
==20753== possibly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==20753== still reachable: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==20753== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==20753== Rerun with --leak-check=full to see details of leaked memory
==20753==
==20753== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
==20753== ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
但是在我将上面的代码修改为:
int main(){
spyder sA("A"), sB("B");
std::weak_ptr<spyder> wp_sA( std::make_shared<spyder>("A") ) ;
std::weak_ptr<spyder> wp_sB( std::make_shared<spyder>("B") );
sA.finger = wp_sB.lock();
sB.finger = wp_sA.lock();
}
内存泄漏没有发生,
==20695== Memcheck, a memory error detector
==20695== Copyright (C) 2002-2017, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==20695== Using Valgrind-3.14.0 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info
==20695== Command: ./t
==20695==
==20695==
==20695== HEAP SUMMARY:
==20695== in use at exit: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==20695== total heap usage: 3 allocs, 3 frees, 72,832 bytes allocated
==20695==
==20695== All heap blocks were freed -- no leaks are possible
==20695==
==20695== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
==20695== ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
我对此感到困惑。
最佳答案
你根本没有解决循环依赖。
在你的第一个版本中,
sA
由shared_ptr
管理,并将shared_ptr
存储到sB
。 sB
又由 shared_ptr
管理,并将 shared_ptr
存储到 sA
。这意味着它们的引用计数永远不会变为 0。
相反,finger
应该是 std::weak_ptr
类型,您应该只在需要使用它之前lock()
它。
class spyder {
public:
spyder(std::string _name):
m_name(_name), finger()
{ }
inline const std::string ask_name() const{
return m_name;
}
std::weak_ptr<spyder> finger;
private:
std::string m_name;
};
int main(){
auto sA = std::make_shared<spyder>("A");
auto sB = std::make_shared<spyder>("B");
sA->finger = sB;
sB->finger = sA;
}
你的第二个版本
从临时 shared_ptr
构造 weak_ptr
,这意味着在构造之后您的 weak_ptr
是 expired()
。 sA.finger
和 sB.finger
都存储了 nullptr
在此版本中(但没有内存泄漏)。
关于c++ - 关于 "circular reference",我使用了 weak_ptr 但内存泄漏仍然发生,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/57851897/