尽管我是一名资深的 C 程序员，但我最近才了解到可以直接将结构变量分配给彼此而不是使用 memcpy:
struct MyStruct a,b;
...
a = b; /* implicit memcpy */
虽然这对 C 来说感觉有点“高级”，但绝对有用。但是为什么我不能做平等和不平等的比较:
if (a == b) ...
if (a != b) ...
标准是否有充分的理由将其排除在外？或者这是否与 - 否则非常优雅 - 标准不一致？
我不明白为什么我可以替换我的 memcpy 来进行干净的分配，但我必须保留那些丑陋的 memcmp。
最佳答案
根据 comp.lang.c FAQ :
There is no good way for a compiler to implement structure comparison (i.e. to support the == operator for structures) which is consistent with C's low-level flavor. A simple byte-by-byte comparison could founder on random bits present in unused "holes" in the structure (such padding is used to keep the alignment of later fields correct). A field-by-field comparison might require unacceptable amounts of repetitive code for large structures. Any compiler-generated comparison could not be expected to compare pointer fields appropriately in all cases: for example, it's often appropriate to compare char * fields with strcmp rather than ==.
If you need to compare two structures, you'll have to write your own function to do so, field by field.
关于c - 为什么我可以分配结构但不能比较它们，我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1882974/