我一直认为使用“if”比捕获异常要好得多(就性能而言)。例如，这样做:
User u = Users.getUser("Michael Jordan");
if(u!=null)
System.out.println(u.getAge());
对比
User u = Users.getUser("Michael Jordan");
try{
System.out.println(u.getAge());
}catch(Exception e){
//Do something with the exception
}
如果我们对此进行基准测试，很明显第一个片段比第二个片段快。这就是我一直认为的。 但是，昨天，一个人告诉我这样的话:
Have you ever considered what happens in thousands of executions of your programs? Every time your execution goes through your "if" you've a little (real little, but still something) performance cost. With exceptions it doesn't happens. Becouse it could never arise.
明确一点:数千次执行“if”与一次异常捕获。
我觉得有道理，但是没有证据。
你能帮帮我吗？
谢谢!!
最佳答案
没有。一旦 JIT 启动，就不会告诉他继续阅读 trace caches .
A dynamic trace ("trace path") contains only instructions whose results are actually used, and eliminates instructions following taken branches (since they are not executed); a dynamic trace can be a concatenation of multiple basic blocks. This allows the instruction fetch unit of a processor to fetch several basic blocks, without having to worry about branches in the execution flow.
基本上，如果每次通过循环体都采用相同的分支，那么该循环体最终将作为跟踪缓存中的单个跟踪。处理器不会产生获取额外分支指令的成本(除非将基本 block 推送到跟踪缓存中可以存储的限制之外，不太可能)并且在开始之前不必等待测试结果执行以下指令。
关于java - 考虑 "if"语句和异常的长期性能成本，我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5411620/