java - 在 Android 代码中模拟创建 AsyncTasks 和 Intents 的优雅方法

Question

我有一个 Android Activity ，其中有类似的调用

final ConnectToServerAsyncTask task = new ConnectToServerAsyncTask(...);

和

final Intent intent = new Intent(this, SomeActivity.class);

为了对此类进行单元测试，我需要能够模拟 ConnectToServerAsyncTask 和 Intent 的创建(例如使用 Mockito)。

还有比下面描述的更优雅的方法吗？

public class MainActivityOfTheApp extends Activity {
    private IAsyncTaskFactory asyncTaskFactory = new AsyncTaskFactory();
    private IIntentFactory intentFactory = new IntentFactory();

    public void setAsyncTaskFactory(final IAsyncTaskFactory aFactory)
    {
        asyncTaskFactory = aFactory;
    }

    public void setIntentFactory(final IIntentFactory aFactory)
    {
        intentFactory = aFactory;
    }

    @Override
    protected void onResume() {
        ...
        final ConnectToServerAsyncTask task = asyncTaskFactory.create(...);
        ...

        final Intent intent = intentFactory.create(this, OtherActivity.class);
        ...
    }
}

在单元测试中，我将创建 MainActivityOfTheApp 的实例，然后使用 setAsyncTaskFactory 和 setIntentFactory 注入(inject)模拟。

Answer 1

PowerMock

您可以使用 PowerMock 模拟构造函数.

因此，在您的情况下，测试将如下所示:

@RunWith(PowerMockRunner.class)
@PrepareForTest(MainActivityOfTheApp.class)
public class MainActivityOfTheAppTest{
  private AsyncTaskFactory asyncTaskFactory;
  private IntentFactory intentFactory;
  private MainActivityOfTheApp mainActivityOfTheApp;

  @Before
  public void prepare() {
    asyncTaskFactory = PowerMockito.mock(AsyncTaskFactory.class);
    intentFactory = PowerMockito.mock(IntentFactory.class);
    PowerMockito.whenNew(AsyncTaskFactory.class).withNoArguments().thenReturn(asyncTaskFactory);
    PowerMockito.whenNew(IntentFactory.class).withNoArguments().thenReturn(intentFactory);
    mainActivityOfTheApp = new MainActivityOfTheApp();
  }

  @Test
  public void doTest() {
    //mainActivityOfTheApp has the mocks in final field inside, no need for the setters.
  }
}

我必须指出，PowerMock 功能强大，但经常在复杂的类加载(例如 OSGI 环境)或代码覆盖工具(例如 jacoco)方面出现问题。它通常可以工作，但我已经浪费了一些时间。

没有 PowerMock

第二种可能性是创建 package private (没有修饰符。为什么不是 protected 或 public？请参阅 What's wrong with overridable method calls in constructors? )方法，它调用构造函数如下:

public class MainActivityOfTheApp extends Activity {
    private final IAsyncTaskFactory asyncTaskFactory = constructAsyncTaskFactory();
    private final IIntentFactory intentFactory = constructIntentFactory();

    IAsyncTaskFactory constructAsyncTaskFactory()
    {
        return new AsyncTaskFactory();
    }

    IIntentFactory constructIntentFactory()
    {
        return new IntentFactory();
    }
    ...
}

然后在你的单元测试中(测试必须与被测试的类位于同一个包中!)你重写construct*()方法:

public class MainActivityOfTheAppTest{
  private AsyncTaskFactory asyncTaskFactory;
  private IntentFactory intentFactory;
  private MainActivityOfTheApp mainActivityOfTheApp;

  @Before
  public void prepare() {
    asyncTaskFactory = mock(AsyncTaskFactory.class);
    intentFactory = mock(IntentFactory.class);
    mainActivityOfTheApp = new HackedMainActivityOfTheApp();
  }

  @Test
  public void doTest() {
    //mainActivityOfTheApp has the mocks in final field inside, no need for the setters.
  }

  private class HackedMainActivityOfTheApp extends MainActivityOfTheApp {
        IAsyncTaskFactory constructAsyncTaskFactory()
        {
            return asyncTaskFactory;
        }

        IIntentFactory constructIntentFactory()
        {
            return intentFactory;
        }
  }
}

如果您对包含 MainActivityOfTheApp 的 jar 进行签名，则可以保护构造*方法。请参阅https://stackoverflow.com/a/968612/337621 :

Also, patches are harder (you have to re-sign the jar), class-patches are impossible (all classes in a single package must have the same signature source) and splitting jars becomes a chore.