& 有 &&。 | 有 ||。为什么^没有^^？
我知道它不会短路，但它会有不同的语义。在 C 中，true 实际上是任何非零值。按位异或并不总是与逻辑异或相同:
int a=strcmp(str1,str2);// evaluates to 1, which is "true"
int b=strcmp(str1,str3);// evaluates to 2, which is also "true"
int c=a ^^ b; // this would be false, since true ^ true = false
int d=a ^ b; //oops, this is true again, it is 3 (^ is bitwise)
既然你不能总是依赖一个真正的值是 1 或 -1，那么 ^^ 运算符不是很好吗有帮助吗？我经常不得不做这样奇怪的事情:
if(!!a ^ !!b) // looks strange
最佳答案
There are both historical and practical reasons why there is no
^^operator.The practical is: there's not much use for the operator. The main point of
&&and||is to take advantage of their short-circuit evaluation not only for efficiency reasons, but more often for expressiveness and correctness.
[...]
By contrast, an^^operator would always force evaluation of both arms of the expression, so there's no efficiency gain. Furthermore, situations in which^^is really called for are pretty rare, though examples can be created. These situations get rarer and stranger as you stack up the operator--if (cond1() ^^ cond2() ^^ cond3() ^^ ...) ...does the consequent exactly when an odd number of the
condx()s are true. By contrast, the&&and||analogs remain fairly plausible and useful.
关于c++ - 为什么 C/C++ 中没有 ^^ 运算符？，我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题： https://stackoverflow.com/questions/837265/