我在玩 SFINAE,发现我无法解释的行为。
这个 compiles fine :
template<typename Integer,
std::enable_if_t<std::is_integral<Integer>::value>* = nullptr>
void foo(Integer) {}
template<typename Floating,
std::enable_if_t<std::is_floating_point<Floating>::value>* = nullptr>
void foo(Floating) {}
虽然这个(nullptr
替换为 0
):
template<typename Integer,
std::enable_if_t<std::is_integral<Integer>::value>* = 0>
void foo(Integer) {}
template<typename Floating,
std::enable_if_t<std::is_floating_point<Floating>::value>* = 0>
void foo(Floating) {}
prog.cpp: In function ‘int main()’: prog.cpp:13:10: error: no matching function for call to ‘foo(int)’
foo(3);
^ prog.cpp:5:6: note: candidate: template<class Integer, std::enable_if_t<std::is_integral<_Tp>::value>* <anonymous> > void foo(Integer) void foo(Integer) {}
^~~ prog.cpp:5:6: note: template argument deduction/substitution failed: prog.cpp:4:64: error: could not convert template argument ‘0’ to ‘std::enable_if_t<true, void>* {aka void*}’
std::enable_if_t<std::is_integral<Integer>::value>* = 0>
^ prog.cpp:9:6: note: candidate: template<class Floating, std::enable_if_t<std::is_floating_point<_Tp>::value>* <anonymous> > void foo(Floating) void foo(Floating) {}
^~~ prog.cpp:9:6: note: template argument deduction/substitution failed: prog.cpp:8:71: note: invalid template non-type parameter
std::enable_if_t<std::is_floating_point<Floating>::value>* = 0>
^
当没有替换失败时,enable_if_t
扩展为 void
,所以我将在模板列表中添加类似 void* = 0
的内容参数。为什么它会破坏编译?..
最佳答案
默认模板参数遵循它们自己的更严格的转换规则。不应用 0
到指针类型的转换。
见 [temp.arg.nontype]/5.2 (强调我的):
for a non-type template-parameter of type pointer to object, qualification conversions ([conv.qual]) and the array-to-pointer conversion ([conv.array]) are applied; if the template-argument is of type
std::nullptr_t
, the null pointer conversion ([conv.ptr]) is applied.[ Note: In particular, neither the null pointer conversion for a zero-valued integral constant expression ([conv.ptr]) nor the derived-to-base conversion ([conv.ptr]) are applied. Although
0
is a valid template-argument for a non-type template-parameter of integral type, it is not a valid template-argument for a non-type template-parameter of pointer type. However, both(int*)0
andnullptr
are valid template-arguments for a non-type template-parameter of type “pointer to int.” — end note ]
关于c++ - 为什么 `void* = 0` 和 `void* = nullptr` 会有所不同?,我们在Stack Overflow上找到一个类似的问题: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/50765742/